You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the same vein as #1577, when our deadlock analysis proves the program deadlock-free, there's no explanation or proof of the fact. Whereas in the case of possible deadlocks we output a locking cycle.
The proof of the locking graph being non-cyclic would be a topological sorting of its nodes. When requested, we could compute the topological ordering and output it as a group message, just like locking cycles are outputted as group messages (meaning a cycle instead).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the same vein as #1577, when our deadlock analysis proves the program deadlock-free, there's no explanation or proof of the fact. Whereas in the case of possible deadlocks we output a locking cycle.
The proof of the locking graph being non-cyclic would be a topological sorting of its nodes. When requested, we could compute the topological ordering and output it as a group message, just like locking cycles are outputted as group messages (meaning a cycle instead).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: