Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not Skia pathops? #1141

Open
simoncozens opened this issue Jan 11, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Why not Skia pathops? #1141

simoncozens opened this issue Jan 11, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

Conventional wisdom is "Skia pathops is OK but has some edge cases and you should use booleanOperations because it's 'better'." But I can't find anything to back this up. Can we use this issue to collect and identify the differences?

@khaledhosny
Copy link
Collaborator

I think anything known is probably reported here https://github.com/fonttools/skia-pathops/issues. My perception is the other way around, skia pathops are overall better, but booleanOperations is kept as the default for backward compatibility.

I think the same applies to compreffor vs cffsubr. I think we should do a major release and change all these defaults.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants