-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
multi-beam joints #207
Comments
The eternal question! |
to k or not to k |
Ive been thinking about this a bit. maybe we can start with direct joints that take multiple elements but that can skip the topology solver steps. |
I think there's some duplicates, since it's such a controversial issue ;) |
Closed
10 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Some thoughts that came up during discussion with @jonashaldemann:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: