Comparison with zbus_systemd?

[ChocolateLoverRaj]

I wanted to programmatically restart a systemd service, and since I didn't want to set the SYSTEMCTL_PATH variable, I used https://github.com/lucab/zbus_systemd instead. The advantage to using the zbus crate is that it is less hacky / unstable because it uses D-Bus instead of the CLI. Can zbus_systemd replace all uses of this crate? Are there some scenarios where this crate is still the better choice?

Even if zbus_systemd can't replace this crate entirely, it would still be good to mention in the README that zbus_systemd might be the better way of controlling systemd with Rust.

After I made this issue I realized that #2 already exists, but nothing was really done with that issue, so I think replacing this crate / mentioning the zbus crate in the README should be reconsidered.