-
Hello, I am trying to do an expansion/retraction analysis on a plant genome dataset. I have 10 different species (both monocots and eudicots with different ploidies) and I keep encountering this error (I have already removed a few families that had really high differences in species I was not so interested in). I don't understand why this is happening, because if I am searching for expansions, this is exactly what I am looking for, right? Many genes in a family in a single species. Can you please help me in some way? I have used the script Thank you in advance!
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments
-
Hello, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You may have better luck asking on the mailing list. https://groups.google.com/g/hahnlabcafe |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, has anyone solved this as I am also experiencing the same problem :) Thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This error indicates that CAFE couldn't even find a starting point to begin running the optimizer. It could be that your tree is simply too big, and/or your families too variable, for CAFE to make sense of the data. As there is likely to be lots of conflict deep in the tree, an option would be to use sub-clades of the tree in independent runs. Dr. Hahn also says, "You could also try parsimony-based methods (e.g. “Count”), which would be guaranteed to give you something!" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello, Previously, I saw a suggestion to reduce the -l value, so I attempted the following commands: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This error indicates that CAFE couldn't even find a starting point to begin running the optimizer. It could be that your tree is simply too big, and/or your families too variable, for CAFE to make sense of the data. As there is likely to be lots of conflict deep in the tree, an option would be to use sub-clades of the tree in independent runs. Dr. Hahn also says, "You could also try parsimony-based methods (e.g. “Count”), which would be guaranteed to give you something!"