-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid validation warning for choices that are allowed to occur multiple times #955
Comments
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 60 days. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
@JohannaOtt I think this can only be investigated meaningfully with a reproduction case. Do you still happen to have the project that caused this problem? I've tried to create a simple reproduction case (attached here) but couldn't get the same validation message when adding two |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 60 days. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
I created this repo case It has many validation warnings as I did not aim to fill al mandatory elements but it also has the validation warning described in this issue |
Description done with an example case to make the schema construct easier to understand: Work with omso:ProfileObservation
The element result.ReferenceableGridCoverage.rangeSet.ValueArray.valueComponents can contain multiple occurrences of the choice used in it. That means, if multiple values (e.g. AbstractValue.Count and AbstractValue.QuantityList) are provided for one object, the transformed data should be valid. But there is a validation warning:
According to the relevant schema,
--> this means that it can be replaced by multiple group:Value elements (which are using various abstract elements respectively their children) and there should be no validation warning in hale studio
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: