Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conda failing to resolve when pymapd is in dependencies #308

Open
datapythonista opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Conda failing to resolve when pymapd is in dependencies #308

datapythonista opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@datapythonista
Copy link

Not sure the exact reason, but when running conda install -c conda-forge pymapd, the conda solver takes a very long time.

And if pymapd is in a requirements file with other dependencies, the resolution may not be feasible (the solver takes more than one hour, or never finishes).

I guess there is something in pymapd dependencies that is causing this. It's happening at least with Python 3.6 and 3.7.

@xmnlab
Copy link
Contributor

xmnlab commented Apr 29, 2020

hey @datapythonista could you provide the environment pkg list you used to install pymapd?

in a new conda environment, the command conda install pymapd took ~22 s

real    0m22,116s
user    0m18,043s
sys     0m1,888s

@datapythonista
Copy link
Author

I thought I tried it in a clean miniconda environment, but apparently now. I tried now, and it resolves in a reasonable time.

Not sure what was the dependency or dependencies that were installed that were causing the problem. I'll leave the issue open, since I still think there is a problem with the dependencies. I'll try to have a look to see if I can find the package that is making the solver be super slow when solved together with pymapd.

Thanks @xmnlab

@vaceslav
Copy link

vaceslav commented Jan 4, 2021

Is it possible to install pymapd with latest version of rapids 0.17 and cudatoolkit 11.0? I can't install it in a new environment.

Only rapids 0.14 and cudatoolkit 10.2 is possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants