You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's actually two levels of variables to be received from PSS to EPD and not one.
Currently, we use the resource Plan definition to return the data required in the field input.requirement (fieldtype datarequirement) :
The problem is that when we analyze the fieldtype datarequirement in FHIR, we see that we can't put two levels of variable in the structure :
Is it possible to structure it in PlanDefinition
Would another resource be relevant instead of planDefinition (for example, something more flexible like parameters ?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
NathanPeeters
changed the title
[Question - Functional] Patient variables fit in PlanDefinition, what about patient parameter ?
[Question - Functional] Support Parameters fit in PlanDefinition, what about patient variables ?
Apr 23, 2024
Following 24/04/2024 meeting with José : If this solution is maintained, possibility to use field "profile" to integrate a questionnaire. Nathan answer : Not sure it is feasable, but I found "definition(x)" in the plan definition that maybe could fit to associate a questionnaireResponse
There's actually two levels of variables to be received from PSS to EPD and not one.
Currently, we use the resource Plan definition to return the data required in the field input.requirement (fieldtype datarequirement) :
The problem is that when we analyze the fieldtype datarequirement in FHIR, we see that we can't put two levels of variable in the structure :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: