You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two versions of this dataset:
USGS_LPC_MN_Phase1_FairbaultCO_2010_LAS_2016
and
USGS_LPC_MN_Phase1_FairbaultCo_2010_LAS_2016
Note, the only difference is the "CO" vs "Co" in the filename. I differenced the top-level entwine directories, and the ept-data subdirectories, and the only difference seems to be a slight difference in the timestamp on laz files. I spot-checked a couple of the laz files and they were identical.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, this is a duplicate which appears to have been present since the initial EPT copy. Both WorkUnits were copied 12/30/2018. I will be recommending removal of USGS_LPC_MN_Phase1_FairbaultCo_2010_LAS_2016 from the public dataset while retaining USGS_LPC_MN_Phase1_FairbaultCO_2010_LAS_2016 because the latter name better matches the current name in the WESM that uses the upper-case 'CO'. Other duplicates exist as well which will also need to be deleted in the future to save cost and avoid confusion.
There are two versions of this dataset:
USGS_LPC_MN_Phase1_FairbaultCO_2010_LAS_2016
and
USGS_LPC_MN_Phase1_FairbaultCo_2010_LAS_2016
Note, the only difference is the "CO" vs "Co" in the filename. I differenced the top-level entwine directories, and the ept-data subdirectories, and the only difference seems to be a slight difference in the timestamp on laz files. I spot-checked a couple of the laz files and they were identical.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: