You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 28, 2023. It is now read-only.
In the case to use Krangl for data pre-processing in Deep Learning (model operate on Float), to have FloatCol might be useful for large data set (memory usage). -- only see DoubleCol implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I share the argument. Technically it would be even easy to do so. However. as we are currently use Array<Double?> to support NA, DoubleCol is not backed by a double-array, so we loose a lot of efficiency. The same would apply for FloatCol, so I'm not sure if adding using the current backend storage model makes much sense wrt to memory usage.
So my plan was/is to first find a more memory-efficient DoubleCol implementation, and then adopt the pattern when adding FloatCol.
In the case to use Krangl for data pre-processing in Deep Learning (model operate on Float), to have FloatCol might be useful for large data set (memory usage). -- only see DoubleCol implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: