You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
misirov
changed the title
Allow users to use upper case opcodes like ADD
Allow users to use upper case opcodes like ADD without breaking the compiler
Jan 30, 2023
I would argue it would be best to keep it lowercase since uppercase is reserved for user-defined macros, constants, etc. As @AbhinavMir mentioned, this is less ambiguous to do one or the other and toggling caps-lock just for instructions would be slower to write.
Fair enough. If this is a standard to follow and changing it introduces unnecessary complexity then it would make sense to keep it as is.
For context, myself (and others I know) are used to uppercase opcodes and default to them when doing context switching, so it's more of a dev UX nitpick than anything else. @jtriley-eth
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Related to Allow users to use PUSH opcode without breaking the compiler.
Allow users to scream their opcodes out loud. Compiler could translate all uppercase
ADD
instances to lowercaseadd
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: