Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently we have a rule that discourages the usage of magic
__serialize
and__unserialize
while suggesting usage of theSerializable
interface.That was the "state of the art" up to PHP 7.3, and the rule even predates that.
With PHP 7.4 the
Serializable
interface is not recommended anymore (the RFC define it as "severely broken").The new recommended method is to use
__serialize
and__unserialize
methods.Not being a major release PHP 7.4 did not deprecate
Serializable
.PHP 8.1 triggers a deprecation warning if
Serializable
without also having__serialize
and__unserialize
.And PHP 9 will probably remove the interface altogether.
Because v2 is PHP 7.4 we can safely discourage
Serializable
already and fully recommend__serialize
and__unserialize
.This PR does that by:
__serialize
and__unserialize
to actually suggest them where__sleep
and__wakeup
are usedSerializable
interface, suggesting__serialize
and__unserialize
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Feature.
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
__serialize
and__unserialize
are discouragedSerializable
interface is suggestedWhat is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
__serialize
and__unserialize
are suggestedSerializable
interface is discouragedDoes this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
Other information:
--