Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I would so love this! - I was just about to start a new discussion about what I need to get rid of direnv completely. In direnv I have a lot of little "plugins" or helper scripts if you will, just like I work for multiple clients, and I assign a named environment to a specific iTerm window using a helper: Here is some of my helpers:
All of this is done from within |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Following #1357 (comment), I share my concern about making One thing I like with
I like the current separation of concerns where However I would have 2 env sections, one executed before tools activation, one after to be able to reference side effects of activations. [env]
SOME_VAR_THAT_MIGHT_BE_NEEDED_BEFORE_ACTIVATION = "value"
[tool]
python = "3.11"
[python]
virtualenv = ".venv"
[lazyenv] # just for the example, naming TBD
SOME_VAR = "{{ env.VIRTUAL_ENV }}/some/extra/path" Combinated with #1262, this would give a lot of possibilities while keeping |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm wondering what more could be done with the environments portion of rtx.
Now that I'm presenting rtx less as a direct clone of asdf and a suite of tools, envs, and tasks, I feel the "env" section is a little light. Any thoughts on what else it could do?
Lack of features certainly isn't a problem of course, but I'm wondering if there's some potential we might be able to take advantage of.
I am considering moving the virtualenv stuff from python over to it for one, but that's not new functionality.
A couple of ideas:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions