How to resolve: Triggering challenge on spotify account generation?

[AlexPaiva]

Saw your reply, that for some reason was deleted, to my question and I checked your tool out and wanted to ask:
I want to create mass accounts on spotify, and currently I am using UC only, with that and a different proxy everytime I can create one or two accounts but after that it always redirects me to a 'challenge' page, which means basically something is triggering their mass action filter, I assume fingerprinting? Would this tool help me with this challenge or? You seem to have botting experience, any help you can give me on this?

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

I assume you're refering to stack overflow? Yes, some answers of mine were deleted because of "undisclosed promotion". Didn't know I need to disclose that I'm the author of Selenium-Profiles back then:)

Refering to your question:

1. Fingerprinting
   To resolve this one, you'll need a lot of different profiles for Selenium-Profiles. The best way would be, to export them from real devices. Or you can try generating random ones (they'll still need to be valid//consistent tho)

Also, make sure to restart (or at least clear the cookies) in between of the generation

Note: I am not responsible for what you do with my code, meaning: For educational purposes only.

[AlexPaiva]

1. So you're using always the same google-account? Or what do you mean by "google-session" ?

   2. No, not yet. Unfortanetly I don't own any website I could use to collect fingerprints or have access to enough data.

   3. Oh that's interesting, didn't know. Can you provide reproducible script for UC and the version in which it gets detected? I'd like to have a look, and maybe improve Selenium-Profiles based on that.

   4. Depends. When you start Selenium-Profiles with uc_driver=True , it uses the currently installed version. If it's set to False, it uses my own anti-detection mechanism.

1. A pool os 10 random chrome profiles each with a different google account logged in (what I call session)
2. There should be data somewhere on the internet for this
3. Being detected with send keys but not with manual input ultrafunkamsterdam/undetected-chromedriver#1074 and more around regarding this, just take a look
4. How does yours compare to UC? Any 'benchmarks'?

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

1. I see. Couldn't it be that it just detects that you're using the same google account multiple times?
2. Only for useragent - yes. But didn't find any which include all the data nececeary. A minimal profile would be for example:

profile = {"cdp":{"touch":True,"maxtouchpoints":10,"emulation":{"mobile":False,"width":1280,"height":720,"deviceScaleFactor":1.5,"screenOrientation":{"type":"landscapePrimary","angle":0}},"useragent":{"platform":"Win32","acceptLanguage":"de-DE","userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/111.0.0.0 Safari/537.36","userAgentMetadata":{"brands":[{"brand":"Google Chrome","version":"111"},{"brand":"Not(A:Brand","version":"8"},{"brand":"Chromium","version":"111"}],"fullVersionList":[{"brand":"Google Chrome","version":"111.0.5563.65"},{"brand":"Not(A:Brand","version":"8.0.0.0"},{"brand":"Chromium","version":"111.0.5563.65"}],"fullVersion":"111.0.5563.65","platform":"Windows","platformVersion":"10.0.0","architecture":"x86","model":"","mobile":False,"bitness":"64","wow64":False}}}}

If you manage to find some data, I of course would consider developing some perser to implement//analyze them.

3. See the point. About .sendkeys, I don't have any detectability-tests yet for Selenium-Profiles. Feel free to test and give some feedback:)
4. Currently, cloudfare protected websites (eg. www.nowsecure.nl) and creep-js are my tools to compare.

• Cloudfare, google and others pass without issues (version in profile must be approximately same as the browser, see Detected on Chromium 110 #26 )
• creep-js reports approximately the same on undetected-chromedriver. You can compare them yourself if you'd like to:)
  Main point: I think the detection is currently approximately the same level, just that Selenium-Profiles allows emulation//changing the browser profile and has some extra features built-in

[AlexPaiva]

1. No because every time it's a different google account, a pool of around 100
2. We discussing that below I believe
3. What do you mean?
4. Exactly what I was thinking. You're using UC version that is available on my system or the latest github one?

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

1. No because every time it's a different google account, a pool of around 100
2. We discussing that below I believe
3. What do you mean?
4. Exactly what I was thinking. You're using UC version that is available on my system or the latest github one?

1. Alright then
2. In other words: I don't know how detectable .sendkeys() with my package is.
3. The one installed

[AlexPaiva]

Ok, when I do give this a try I will let you know

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

https://github.com/apify/fingerprint-generator But unfortanely not written in Python and deprecated//not maintained

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

@AlexPaiva actually, I might be able to integrate https://github.com/apify/fingerprint-suite 🤔

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

I'd prefer Python. But I'm pretty sure there should be a way to use the data provided in there to generate profiles using Python.
But unfortanely, I currently don't have the capacity to develop in. Although if you develop some script, I'd happily implement it of course:)

[AlexPaiva]

Not much experience to pass into python, any clues here?

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

Mhh well I'd start with the following:

1. Understand what fingerprint-suit does programmatically (structure, ..)
2. Simpflify and recreate in Python with less data
3. Extend and implement other features to get the desired output.

Can't help you a lot more at that point

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

@AlexPaiva any updates on this discussion?

[AlexPaiva]

Not really, just used random chrome extensions and it did the trick to randomize things at the launch of the browser.

[kaliiiiiiiiii]

closing because of inactivity