You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When analyzing GW170817 as shown in the example, if the prior of cos(iota) is changed to [-1,-0.9], then choose a number of chain = 800 will give non-sensible result, such as nan in the log_prob.
Further investigation shows number of chains = 601, 801 will also give the same behavior. But 100, 500, 501 performs normally.
This is very weird, which I think it has to do with the training of the normalizing flow and thinning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is a report on the following breaking mode:
When analyzing GW170817 as shown in the example, if the prior of cos(iota) is changed to [-1,-0.9], then choose a number of chain = 800 will give non-sensible result, such as nan in the log_prob.
Further investigation shows number of chains = 601, 801 will also give the same behavior. But 100, 500, 501 performs normally.
This is very weird, which I think it has to do with the training of the normalizing flow and thinning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: