-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add syzygy diskdefs for TRS-80 M1 #429
Comments
In the above thread, a command line addition was given for TRS-80 LDOS disks - --dd L . What does this do? |
|
The forum post seems to indicate that these defs are WIP. For example the NewDOS formats are unproven. I will wait and see if syzygy has any more to say on them. |
Hi, I've been participating in a discussion about diskdefs for TRS-80 on the Vintage Computers forum, and it was suggested that I post my findings here. These findings are for a Model III TRS-80 but I believe apply to Model I as well. First, for the TRS80SSDD.40T and TRS80DSDD.40T, in addition to the diskdefs above, I believe one should add:
The disks appear to work with the value set to 1, but the TRSDOS 1.3 disk images I've seen - and have successfully tested on a real Model 3 - have interleave 6. Then I also did some work with LDOS. Its sector numbering starts at 0, with an interleave of 3. An LDOS disk image written with these parameters boots on a real Model III:
Hope this is useful, |
Concur completely. They were (and still are) VERY much a Work-in-Progress (WIP). I confess, I have not returned to the project yet. As I remember (correct me if in error), NEWDOS [2.0?] allowed you to easily supply tracks and sectors using the PDRIVE command. It would seem to me that this might make it difficult to have any kind of standard definition for NEWDOS. |
I want to concur with the concurrence. I am a relative newbie on this floppy stuff and have just been drinking from the firehose as I've gotten my own system going. I present my findings as just that, findings for consideration by the community. Also, I was thinking overnight and it occurs to me that my findings may not apply to Model I at all because I think it only does single density? So maybe my results need to be sequestered into a "Model 3/Model 4" section. |
syzygy did some work last year developing appropriate diskdefs for TRS-80 model 1 disks. As it hasn't yet been added to GW diskdefs releases, it could be.
https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/greaseweazle-v4-reading-m1-5-25-floppies-on-a-sa400a-drive.1242918/
diskdefs uploaded July 11 2023
disk TRS80SSSD.35T
cyls = 35
heads = 1
tracks * ibm.fm
secs = 10
id=0
bps = 256
gap1=20
gap2=20
gap3=20
rate = 125
end
end
disk TRS80SSSD.40T
cyls = 40
heads = 1
tracks * ibm.fm
secs = 10
id=1
bps = 256
gap1=20
gap2=20
gap3=20
rate = 125
end
end
disk TRS80NDSSSD.40T
cyls = 40
heads = 1
tracks * ibm.fm
secs = 10
id=0
bps = 256
gap1=20
gap2=20
gap3=20
rate = 125
end
end
disk TRS80NDSSDD.40T
cyls = 40
heads = 1
tracks * ibm.mfm
secs = 18
id=0
bps = 256
gap1=20
gap2=20
gap3=40
rate = 250
end
end
disk TRS80NDSSDD.35T
cyls = 35
heads = 1
tracks * ibm.mfm
secs = 18
id=1
bps = 256
gap1=20
gap2=20
gap3=40
rate = 250
end
end
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: