-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance issues with smallgicp, while the old fast-gicp version does very well with the same data. PCD is too small warning. #89
Comments
The warning on the point cloud size is shown when the number of points is less or equals to 10, that indicates something strange is happening on your input point clouds. Can you provide minimum example code and data to reproduce the problem?
|
Hi, Koide3. When I tried to run the code in the 01_basic_registration.cpp from the example, this problem occurred. However, I didn't modify any code. |
@junwei1999 |
Koide3, thank you for your reply.
The following figure shows the size of the target point cloud and the source point cloud before entering the align function.
However, when entering the align template function, the size of both target and source become 0.
It seems that only the references are passed and nothing is done, yet the data is lost.
…------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "koide3/small_gicp" ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2025年2月10日(星期一) 上午9:42
***@***.***>;
***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [koide3/small_gicp] Performance issues with smallgicp, while the old fast-gicp version does very well with the same data. PCD is too small warning. (Issue #89)
@junwei1999
Can you print out the number of points just before running example1?
https://github.com/koide3/small_gicp/blob/2c5e9e6092f06bd8b4a0c618c9714e39e4b315dc/src/example/01_basic_registration.cpp#L66
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
The fast-gicp version of GICP works pretty well with my python pipeline and data. However, with small-gicp I keep getting the warning "target/source pcd is too small" and the resulting accuracy is very poor. Do you have any intuition where the difference may be coming from? Note, this is the case regardless of downsampling.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: