Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple components aren't working. #87

Open
sburban-oracle opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Multiple components aren't working. #87

sburban-oracle opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@sburban-oracle
Copy link

I'm excited to use this theme but I'm running into a lot of things that don't seem right. I extracted the css/fonts/js folders into my project folder and imported them all into my website, seems to work fine. However so far:

  1. The loading animation isn't working, I tried adding the script
    <script> _386 = {onePass: true, speedFactor: 1.25 }; </script>
    No matter what I do with it, there WILL be a loading animation but instead of loading up my page content it just appears below all my page content weirdly enough. Like, when the page loads, it'll generate a blank space below all my content that slowly unloads itself. I also have body visibility: hidden; in my CSS file. Am I doing something wrong?

  2. Pills, tabs, nav lists etc. aren't working properly. They either aren't working at all or they'll show up, but they look like a plain list and don't have any stylization. Like this:
    image

Any help?

@kristopolous
Copy link
Owner

send me a link and I'll look into it

@kristopolous
Copy link
Owner

sorry, things get way lost in my github notifications.

@sburban-oracle
Copy link
Author

No problem, I don't care much about the problem any more seeing as I just wasn't completely familiar with the theme. I got it under control. But on the other hand do you mind telling me where I can find the config.json file for this theme? Thanks a ton.

@kristopolous
Copy link
Owner

oh sorry I just saw this. There is no "config.json" This is a proper fork. There's exhaustive changes with backwards compatibility "guaranteed". It's more of a rewrite.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants