We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When we use KIM only, provisioner is no longer used, we need to simplify and unify configuration.
To many steps we pass separately input.Config and broker.KimConfig objects.
input.Config
broker.KimConfig
AC:
provisioner
kim
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Blocked till migration is done.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Following configuration values should be migrated to kim section (are used to create Runtime CRs`:
Provisioner.KubernetesVersion
Provisioner.DefaultGardenerShootPurpose
Provisioner.MachineImage
Provisioner.MachineImageVersion
Provisioner.DefaultTrialProvider
Provisioner.MultiZoneCluster
Provisioner.ControlPlaneFailureTolerance
We could consider moving:
Broker.UseSmallerMachineTypes
Following values should be moved to other place (possible section with timeouts - there are more timeouts settings scattered):
Provisioner.ProvisioningTimeout
Provisioner.DeprovisioningTimeout
Provisioner.RuntimeResourceStepTimeout
Provisioner.ClusterUpdateStepTimeout
Following values should be removed (double check before actual removal):
Provisioner.URL
Provisioner.TrialNodesNumber
Provisioner.AutoUpdateKubernetesVersion
Provisioner.AutoUpdateMachineImageVersion
Provisioner.EnableShootAndSeedSameRegion
Removal is blocked until provisioner is decommissioned and only KIM is driving/controlling the process.
This is blocked by #1187 and #1298
jaroslaw-pieszka
No branches or pull requests
When we use KIM only, provisioner is no longer used, we need to simplify and unify configuration.
To many steps we pass separately
input.Config
andbroker.KimConfig
objects.AC:
provisioner
related settings (this is in scope of different ticket)kim
sectionThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: