java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 9 #300

andersonDadario · 2017-11-04T18:33:15Z

Tried to use s3_website on Mac and unfortunately it does not run with Java 9

user$ s3_website push --dry-run
[info] Downloading https://github.com/laurilehmijoki/s3_website/releases/download/v3.4.0/s3_website.jar into /var/folders/pv/qhqsh1rj0r11dknn95w1yxbmvfy2z6/T//s3_website-3.4.0.jar
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
	at org.jruby.Ruby.newInstance(Ruby.java:266)
	at s3.website.Ruby$.rubyRuntime$lzycompute(Ruby.scala:4)
	at s3.website.Ruby$.rubyRuntime(Ruby.scala:4)
	at s3.website.model.Config$$anonfun$15.apply(Config.scala:229)
	at s3.website.model.Config$$anonfun$15.apply(Config.scala:227)
	at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
	at s3.website.model.Config$.erbEval(Config.scala:227)
	at s3.website.model.Site$$anonfun$2.apply(Site.scala:28)
	at s3.website.model.Site$$anonfun$2.apply(Site.scala:27)
	at scala.util.Success.flatMap(Try.scala:231)
	at s3.website.model.Site$.parseConfig(Site.scala:27)
	at s3.website.model.Site$.loadSite(Site.scala:100)
	at s3.website.Push$.push(Push.scala:62)
	at s3.website.Push$.main(Push.scala:40)
	at s3.website.Push.main(Push.scala)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 9
	at org.jruby.RubyInstanceConfig.initGlobalJavaVersion(RubyInstanceConfig.java:1878)
	at org.jruby.RubyInstanceConfig.<clinit>(RubyInstanceConfig.java:1585)
	... 15 more

Java version

user$ java --version
java 9.0.1
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

laurilehmijoki · 2017-11-05T12:33:13Z

Pull request highly appreciated!

laurilehmijoki · 2017-11-05T12:33:43Z

And thank you for the report :)

andersonDadario · 2017-11-05T13:58:22Z

Btw @laurilehmijoki , thank you for s3 website. It`s a great project :)

damnginamarketing · 2017-11-17T15:42:01Z

Also getting the same issue... would love to get this working as it would be my first time using it. Thank you!

——————

Downloading https://github.com/laurilehmijoki/s3_website/releases/download/v3.4.0/s3_website.jar into /Users/clementyeung/.gem/ruby/2.4.2/gems/s3_website-3.4.0/s3_website-3.4.0.jar Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at org.jruby.Ruby.newInstance(Ruby.java:266) at s3.website.Ruby$.rubyRuntime$lzycompute(Ruby.scala:4) at s3.website.Ruby$.rubyRuntime(Ruby.scala:4) at s3.website.model.Config$$anonfun$15.apply(Config.scala:229) at s3.website.model.Config$$anonfun$15.apply(Config.scala:227) at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192) at s3.website.model.Config$.erbEval(Config.scala:227) at s3.website.model.Site$$anonfun$2.apply(Site.scala:28) at s3.website.model.Site$$anonfun$2.apply(Site.scala:27) at scala.util.Success.flatMap(Try.scala:231) at s3.website.model.Site$.parseConfig(Site.scala:27) at s3.website.model.Site$.loadSite(Site.scala:100) at s3.website.Push$.push(Push.scala:62) at s3.website.Push$.main(Push.scala:40) at s3.website.Push.main(Push.scala) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 9 at org.jruby.RubyInstanceConfig.initGlobalJavaVersion(RubyInstanceConfig.java:1878) at org.jruby.RubyInstanceConfig.<clinit>(RubyInstanceConfig.java:1585) ... 15 more

java --version java 9.0.1 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)

laurilehmijoki · 2017-11-18T04:36:32Z

A workaround is to use jenv: #298

alandipert · 2017-11-28T15:34:45Z

Could this be as simple as upgrading JRuby in build.sbt?

jruby/jruby#4558 (comment)

lucascantor · 2018-01-28T03:24:31Z

My experience figuring out how to use jenv as a workaround, for anyone having trouble:

#298 (comment)

andersonDadario · 2018-04-23T21:15:31Z

I just used Docker, problem solved.

Here is what I did:

Created a s3_website directory on my app root directory
There I created 3 files:

Dockerfile

FROM ruby:2.3.3

RUN apt-get update -qq && \
    apt-get install --assume-yes -y \
       build-essential \
       libpq-dev \
       openjdk-7-jre \
    && apt-get clean \
    && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* /tmp/* /var/tmp/*

# Use en_US.UTF-8 as our locale
ENV LC_CTYPE en_US.UTF-8
ENV LANG en_US.UTF-8

# Run bundle
RUN gem install s3_website && s3_website install

RUN mkdir /app
VOLUME /app
WORKDIR /app

CMD bash

build.sh

#!/bin/bash
docker build -t utils/s3_website .

deploy.sh

#!/bin/bash

docker run --rm \
    --name s3_website \
    -it \
    -v "$(cd .. && pwd):/app" \
    utils/s3_website \
    s3_website push

And I still keep the s3_website.yml file in my app root folder. The app container will access it through a shared volume.

The process is simple:

Install Docker
$ bash build.sh # just need to do it once to create the image
$ bash deploy.sh # loads info from ../s3_website.yml

Note: I am sure that this process can be optimized, e.g., let --dry-run be parameter for deploy.sh, but so far it works well for me.

xaviershay · 2018-07-26T16:48:17Z

I tried and failed to make a PR to fix. I know basically nothing about Scala or Java, so no real surprise. Notes:

Tried to run ./sbt assembly, failed with error around Missing dependency 'object java.lang.Object in compiler mirror'. Googling seems to suggest this is likely a result of sbt being too old for java 9 (0.13.2).
Tried to replace project/sbt-launch.jar with 0.13.7 downloaded from SBT website. Failed with error module not found: org.scala-sbt#sbt;0.13.17. This appears to be same actual error as Unexpected error: java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors parameter must be non-empty #312, workaround posted there. Command now works, but "assembly" not a valid command.
Switched to a project I have an pointed it at local s3_website with path: option in bundler. Still getting error: scala.reflect.internal.MissingRequirementError: object java.lang.Object in compiler mirror not found. when trying to publish.
Turns out something created project/build.properties which was locking SBT version (./sbt sbtVersion) to 0.13. Updated that to 1.1.6 (latest). No cannot resolve sbt-assembly and sbt-idea dependencies, pretty sure those are specified somewhere in this project.
Updated sbt-assembly to latest and removed sbt-idea (for now). Commented out code to fix error: not found: object AssemblyKeys (this will very likely burn me later), sbtVersion now reports 1.1.6.
publishing still results in object java.lang.Object in compiler mirror not found :(

natseg · 2018-08-06T11:39:23Z

#300 (comment) I would also recommend using asdf to manage different versions of java on your mac. It's a meta manager so it can also manage ruby, nodejs, elixir, erlang, ...

That's how I "fixed" this issue on my machine.

AndrewKvalheim · 2018-08-26T20:05:13Z

For searchability:

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 10

rtrvrtg · 2018-10-10T01:17:31Z

Got a colleague with the same problem except their runtime exception message is unsupported Java version: 11

Your build dependencies currently indicate that jRuby 1.7.11 is required. jRuby's Github indicates that the latest versions support up to v10: https://github.com/jruby/jruby/blob/ce15c9d63e7312c47c7d86c2852e93a406459c7b/core/src/main/java/org/jruby/RubyInstanceConfig.java

losomo · 2018-12-13T02:39:04Z

For my future self:
Problem:

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 11
	at org.jruby.RubyInstanceConfig.initGlobalJavaVersion(RubyInstanceConfig.java:1878)

Solution:

PATH=/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/:$PATH s3_website push

xaviershay · 2018-12-31T00:38:14Z

Can confirm that @losomo's workaround worked for me on Ubuntu 18.04 with openjdk-8-jre-headless package installed.

> lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Release:        18.04
Codename:       bionic
> dpkg -S /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64     
openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64

cpury · 2019-02-07T14:16:08Z

So which Java versions are supported? Can we at least mention that in the Readme? I'd hate to download and install one after the other until I hit one that's supported...

nadnoslen · 2019-02-07T16:06:38Z

I ended up brewing down to adoptopenjdk8 (Java 8) in order to get this plugin to work.

Annoying because I had to completely uninstall adoptopenjdk11.

I'm stunned that there is a Java dependency locked at 8? I wonder if @alandipert upgrade of JRuby comment would fix this.

yanokwa · 2019-08-09T19:18:48Z

I've sent in #329 that should allow our beloved s3_website on recent versions of Java. I would love a review!

Summary: we use `s3_website` to push the site to S3. turns out it doesn't support Java 11 yet (laurilehmijoki/s3_website#300) so I updated our docker image to use Java 8. also fixed a deprecation warning about using `bundle install --path`, and fixed a related cwd issue with calling `bundle exec` from outside `website/`. Reviewed By: jbrown215 Differential Revision: D21786250 fbshipit-source-id: 21e01836e6d2cc8b7e33aac992533f1a7153ecdc

xaviershay mentioned this issue Jul 26, 2018

Unexpected error: java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors parameter must be non-empty #312

Open

yanokwa linked a pull request Aug 9, 2019 that will close this issue

Upgrade to run on newer versions of Java #329

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 9 #300

java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 9 #300

andersonDadario commented Nov 4, 2017

laurilehmijoki commented Nov 5, 2017

laurilehmijoki commented Nov 5, 2017

andersonDadario commented Nov 5, 2017

damnginamarketing commented Nov 17, 2017 •

edited

Loading

laurilehmijoki commented Nov 18, 2017

alandipert commented Nov 28, 2017 •

edited

Loading

lucascantor commented Jan 28, 2018

andersonDadario commented Apr 23, 2018

xaviershay commented Jul 26, 2018 •

edited

Loading

natseg commented Aug 6, 2018 •

edited

Loading

AndrewKvalheim commented Aug 26, 2018

rtrvrtg commented Oct 10, 2018 •

edited

Loading

losomo commented Dec 13, 2018

xaviershay commented Dec 31, 2018

cpury commented Feb 7, 2019

nadnoslen commented Feb 7, 2019

yanokwa commented Aug 9, 2019 •

edited

Loading

java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 9 #300

java.lang.RuntimeException: unsupported Java version: 9 #300

Comments

andersonDadario commented Nov 4, 2017

laurilehmijoki commented Nov 5, 2017

laurilehmijoki commented Nov 5, 2017

andersonDadario commented Nov 5, 2017

damnginamarketing commented Nov 17, 2017 • edited Loading

laurilehmijoki commented Nov 18, 2017

alandipert commented Nov 28, 2017 • edited Loading

lucascantor commented Jan 28, 2018

andersonDadario commented Apr 23, 2018

xaviershay commented Jul 26, 2018 • edited Loading

natseg commented Aug 6, 2018 • edited Loading

AndrewKvalheim commented Aug 26, 2018

rtrvrtg commented Oct 10, 2018 • edited Loading

losomo commented Dec 13, 2018

xaviershay commented Dec 31, 2018

cpury commented Feb 7, 2019

nadnoslen commented Feb 7, 2019

yanokwa commented Aug 9, 2019 • edited Loading

damnginamarketing commented Nov 17, 2017 •

edited

Loading

alandipert commented Nov 28, 2017 •

edited

Loading

xaviershay commented Jul 26, 2018 •

edited

Loading

natseg commented Aug 6, 2018 •

edited

Loading

rtrvrtg commented Oct 10, 2018 •

edited

Loading

yanokwa commented Aug 9, 2019 •

edited

Loading