You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am dealing with a complex plant genome (higly heterozygous, haploid genome size 2.5 Gb, I have a diploid assembly of 5 Gb, N50 200 kb, N90 5 kb) and I would like to extend its contiguity with ONT reads.
I thought of using the assembly (has scaffolds, but only 1.5% Ns) as anonther input with the ONT data in the minimap stage, to create extensions of the scaffolds. The ONT data (20x of 5 Gb, N50 9 kb) could be selected to have reads only above 2 kb, for example.
My question is whether the minimap2 alignment or graph construction steps will be affected by having two types of data: highly-accurate scaffolds and ~85% accurate ONT reads. Do you think this will be a good strategy?
Basically, the scaffolds (highly accurate at the nt level, but of coverage 1x) will be a baseline set of sequences to be extended with the longer (with coverage) ONT reads.
Do you think it is worth a try?
Thanks,
Dario
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I am dealing with a complex plant genome (higly heterozygous, haploid genome size 2.5 Gb, I have a diploid assembly of 5 Gb, N50 200 kb, N90 5 kb) and I would like to extend its contiguity with ONT reads.
I thought of using the assembly (has scaffolds, but only 1.5% Ns) as anonther input with the ONT data in the minimap stage, to create extensions of the scaffolds. The ONT data (20x of 5 Gb, N50 9 kb) could be selected to have reads only above 2 kb, for example.
My question is whether the minimap2 alignment or graph construction steps will be affected by having two types of data: highly-accurate scaffolds and ~85% accurate ONT reads. Do you think this will be a good strategy?
Basically, the scaffolds (highly accurate at the nt level, but of coverage 1x) will be a baseline set of sequences to be extended with the longer (with coverage) ONT reads.
Do you think it is worth a try?
Thanks,
Dario
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: