-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Maintenance status of dbt2looker #100
Comments
@PaddyAlton I would love to use this project, is your fork public? Also big up for this, and I would definitely be up to contribute to this project. |
Fork is here, should be public @tobiascadee . If you check out |
amazing, if you don't get a reply here maybe its time to start a new maintained repo |
Agree. But to be honest - the difficulty of integrating Looker with DBT (among other things) is pushing me away from Looker. I may not use it much longer. If I do keep using it, and if |
For me moving away from Looker is not an option unfortunately and I feel that just creating lookml from the database definition would be insufficient for me. |
I am writing this issue to query what the current maintenance status of this project is, and what the plans are (if any) for its future. At the moment the project (in its default state) is broken due to dependency issues.
I have found it to be a useful project. We use it regularly. However, I've been running a custom fork of it since January - and while I have made a series of PRs this year, I haven't heard back about them (the first received an initial review but no follow up).
I do appreciate that this isn't core business for Lightdash and that you've provided this useful tool for free. I'm sure you want to limit any time spent working on it. That being so, I have some suggestions:
I think either of these would be acceptable - I think the community would welcome the clarity in any case.
Many thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: