Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abadie et al (2023) standard errors? #377

Open
kendonB opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

Abadie et al (2023) standard errors? #377

kendonB opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@kendonB
Copy link

kendonB commented Jan 10, 2023

Hi, do you have any plans to implement the standard error estimators from https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/138/1/1/6750017?rss=1 ?

I haven't yet derived the continuous, multivariate version of the CCV estimator. I have emailed Prof. Wooldridge to see if they have it written out somewhere.

@kendonB
Copy link
Author

kendonB commented Jan 10, 2023

I also contacted Achim Zeileis who correctly pointed out that it can't be computed using a traditional sandwich approach so would need to live somewhere like fixest.

@waynelapierre
Copy link

sounds like a great feature to have!

@kendonB
Copy link
Author

kendonB commented Jan 22, 2023

The answer from JW was that they don't yet have the general case derived, he believes it will generalise, and he believes that others are working on it.

@s3alfisc
Copy link

I'd be happy to work on this eventually @kendonB - maybe we could start with an external package which allows to compute the Abadie et al standard errors as a post-estimation command, and then prepare a PR for fixest?

@s3alfisc
Copy link

s3alfisc commented Feb 1, 2023

I think I'll give this a go and try to integrate the AAIW inference procedures as post estimation commands into fwildclusterboot over the next weeks (PR here), unless you'd want to implement them in 'native fixest' in the nearer future, @lrberge ?

@kendonB
Copy link
Author

kendonB commented Feb 1, 2023

Hi @s3alfisc, please go for it - the general case for the CCV estimator doesn't look trivial to derive by analogy and JW has requested that people contact him if they try. The TSCB seems like it would be easier to generalise to the multivariate continuous case. Happy to test and, if I can, review.

@fa-rzam
Copy link

fa-rzam commented Feb 12, 2024

Hi @s3alfisc, I wonder if you might have implemented the CCV or TSCB already? Thanks!

@s3alfisc
Copy link

Hi, not yet, I started a while back but never then always other priorities popped up! If I find some free time this weekend, I'll try to see how far I can get with this =)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants