Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better syntax for effect annotations on Function types #11

Open
lrytz opened this issue May 10, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Better syntax for effect annotations on Function types #11

lrytz opened this issue May 10, 2013 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@lrytz
Copy link
Owner

lrytz commented May 10, 2013

Currently function types have to be effect-annotated using a refined type:

val pureFun: (Int => Int) { def apply(x: Int): Int @pure } = ...

It would be nice to support something as simple as Int => Int @pure.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lrytz