You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. I've been extracting aperture (not difference imaging) photometry with atlas for a few hundreds-thousands of targets and have noticed that quite often the data before MJD~=58000 is very different to the data proceeding it. A good example is this star. It can be found at 273.26941194790476 +22.41385305621907 and is fairly well isolated. The data appears to droop towards lower magnitudes (as is common in multiple, but NOT all, targets isolated by at least 20 arcseconds with no very bright star within 1 arcminute) but then appear to become well calibrated after. See the plot below, colours are unique filters
Do you have any idea what the cause of this could be? All stars I am entering include proper motions in mas/yr from gaia dr3 with its reference epoch. I can send more examples if that would be useful - I have not been able to spot a trend yet of certain declinations where this is more impacted.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi. I've been extracting aperture (not difference imaging) photometry with atlas for a few hundreds-thousands of targets and have noticed that quite often the data before MJD~=58000 is very different to the data proceeding it. A good example is this star. It can be found at 273.26941194790476 +22.41385305621907 and is fairly well isolated. The data appears to droop towards lower magnitudes (as is common in multiple, but NOT all, targets isolated by at least 20 arcseconds with no very bright star within 1 arcminute) but then appear to become well calibrated after. See the plot below, colours are unique filters
Do you have any idea what the cause of this could be? All stars I am entering include proper motions in mas/yr from gaia dr3 with its reference epoch. I can send more examples if that would be useful - I have not been able to spot a trend yet of certain declinations where this is more impacted.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: