-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Retire EMC #52
Comments
It would be more consise. To test what would happen I used:
You can see the results here: https://github.com/bobvanderlinden/machinetalk-protobuf/tree/drop_emc There was one issue with |
Hmm, I think it should be replaced rather than removed. It's just that the term EMC is extremely outdated and nobody knows anyways what it means. Some suggestions? |
Looking at it: It actually does not look that bad without EMC at all. |
|
@Strahlex TrajectoryKinementaticsType does not make sense IMO as there is no intrinsic connection between the two concepts, or a NonTrajectoryKinementaticsType for that matter |
as for the reason why I kept the EMC* names: which is why I am decidedly lukewarm about the big rename because 'EMC' is old - it makes for a new learning curve when reading code without adding value |
Maybe an opportunity to fix #43 int the same pass. I don't think the |
Well then |
EMC is still used in many places https://github.com/machinekit/machinetalk-protobuf/blob/master/src/machinetalk/protobuf/status.proto#L15 maybe a good time to retire that term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: