You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After fixing #154, there is currently no known way to create this situation through MarFS, but it could presumably be reproduced by manually deleting e.g. the second chunk in a Multi.
During the transition in reading from the first to second chunk, the attached log shows that the second GET fails, but that the failure is masked in stream_wait or stream_sync. (Log output was edited to obscure hosts, users, etc.)
dd reports success, even for long sequences covering multiple (non-existent chunks). The marfs file in question was written with all zeros, and the dd gets zeros back, presumably because somebody's read-buffers are zero'ed out.
Note: this situation can not crop up from a failed write to a MarFS file. That would be an "incomplete" file, marked with a RESTART xattr, and open() would always fail. What is shown in the log snippet is the read from a file successfully written before #154 was fixed. But, as noted above, something like this might happen if a chunk-object were destroyed.
After fixing #154, there is currently no known way to create this situation through MarFS, but it could presumably be reproduced by manually deleting e.g. the second chunk in a Multi.
During the transition in reading from the first to second chunk, the attached log shows that the second GET fails, but that the failure is masked in stream_wait or stream_sync. (Log output was edited to obscure hosts, users, etc.)
dd reports success, even for long sequences covering multiple (non-existent chunks). The marfs file in question was written with all zeros, and the dd gets zeros back, presumably because somebody's read-buffers are zero'ed out.
Note: this situation can not crop up from a failed write to a MarFS file. That would be an "incomplete" file, marked with a RESTART xattr, and open() would always fail. What is shown in the log snippet is the read from a file successfully written before #154 was fixed. But, as noted above, something like this might happen if a chunk-object were destroyed.
issue-154.log.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: