-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
/
Copy pathMendeley.bib
11124 lines (11102 loc) · 927 KB
/
Mendeley.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
Automatically generated by Mendeley Desktop 1.19.5
Any changes to this file will be lost if it is regenerated by Mendeley.
BibTeX export options can be customized via Options -> BibTeX in Mendeley Desktop
@article{Callaghan2019,
author = {Callaghan, Max and Minx, Jan C and Forster, Piers},
doi = {10.6084/m9.figshare.9009665.v4},
title = {{A Topography of Climate Change Research - Document and Topic Data}},
url = {https://figshare.com/articles/A{\_}Topography{\_}of{\_}Climate{\_}Change{\_}Research/9009665},
year = {2019}
}
@article{lal2004soil,
author = {Lal, Rattan},
journal = {science},
number = {5677},
pages = {1623--1627},
publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science},
title = {{Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security}},
volume = {304},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Sporton2009,
abstract = {The organic carbon pool in agricultural land-uses is capable of enhancing agricultural sustainability and serving as a potentialsink of atmospheric carbon dioxide. A study was carried out to estimate and map carbon stock of different agricultural land-usesin a sub-watershed of Thailand and to assess the land-use sustainability with respect to carbon management. A quadratsampling methodology was adopted to estimate the biomass and its carbon content of 11 different land-uses in the study area.Existing soil data were used to calculate the soil carbon. GIS was used for integrating biomass carbon, soil carbon and carbonstock mapping. Roth carbon model was used to project the soil carbon of present land-uses in the coming 10 years and based onwhich the sustainability of land-uses was predicted. The total carbon stock of agricultural land-uses was estimated to be 205 Tg,of which 4149 per cent was biomass carbon and 5851 per cent was soil carbon. Among the land-uses, para rubber had thehighest average biomass C (13634MgC ha1) while paddy had the lowest (708MgC ha1). About four-fifths of agriculturalland-uses in the watershed are sustainable in maintaining the desired level of soil carbon in coming 10 years while one-fifths areunstable. Such information on carbon stock could be valuable to develop viable land-use options for agricultural sustainabilityand carbon sequestration. Copyright {\#} 2007 John Wiley {\&} Sons, Ltd.},
author = {Sporton, Deborah},
doi = {10.1002/ldr},
isbn = {1085-3278},
issn = {10853278},
journal = {Land Degradation and Development},
keywords = {AREA,Agricultural land use,Assessment,BIOMASS,CARBON,CARBON SEQUESTRATION,CARBON-DIOXIDE,CARBON-SEQUESTRATION,Carbon stock,DIOXIDE,GIS,INFORMATION,LAND-USE,LEVEL,Landuse,MANAGEMENT,MODEL,Map,ORGANIC-CARBON,Paddy,SEQUESTRATION,SINK,SOIL,SOIL CARBON,Sustainability,Sustainable,THAILAND,carbon dioxide,carbon management,carbon pool,d,data,land use,mapping,methodology,sampling,stock,studies,technology,watershed},
number = {June},
pages = {587--588},
pmid = {57545287},
title = {{CULTIVATING SUCCESS IN UGANDA: KIGEZI FARM- ERSANDCOLONIAL POLICIES, Carswell Grace}},
volume = {20},
year = {2009}
}
@article{ONeill2017,
author = {O'Neill, Brian C and Kriegler, Elmar and Ebi, Kristie L and Kemp-Benedict, Eric and Riahi, Keywan and Rothman, Dale S and van Ruijven, Bas J and van Vuuren, Detlef P and Birkmann, Joern and Kok, Kasper and Levy, Marc and Solecki, William},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004},
issn = {0959-3780},
journal = {Global Environmental Change},
keywords = {Scenarios Climate change Mitigation Adaptation Nar},
pages = {169--180},
title = {{The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century}},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378015000060},
volume = {42},
year = {2017}
}
@article{House2007,
abstract = {We describe an approach to CO2 capture and storage from the atmosphere that involves enhancing the solubility of CO2 in the ocean by a process equivalent to the natural silicate weathering reaction. HCl is electrochemically removed from the ocean and neutralized through reaction with silicate rocks. The increase in ocean alkalinity resulting from the removal of HCl causes atmospheric CO2 to dissolve into the ocean where it will be stored primarily as HCO3− without further acidifying the ocean. On timescales of hundreds of years or longer, some of the additional alkalinity will likely lead to precipitation or enhanced preservation of CaCO3, resulting in the permanent storage of the associated carbon, and the return of an equal amount of carbon to the atmosphere. Whereas the natural silicate weathering process is effected primarily by carbonic acid, the engineered process accelerates the weathering kinetics to industrial rates by replacing this weak acid with HCl. In the thermodynamic limit—and with the app...},
author = {House, Kurt Zenz and House, Christopher H. and Schrag, Daniel P. and Aziz, Michael J.},
doi = {10.1021/es0701816},
isbn = {0013-936x},
issn = {0013-936X},
journal = {Environmental Science {\&} Technology},
keywords = {carbonate dissolution,cells,co2,electrolysis,emissions,fuel,ocean,performance,sea-water,storage},
language = {English},
month = {dec},
number = {24},
pages = {8464--8470},
publisher = { American Chemical Society},
title = {{Electrochemical acceleration of chemical weathering as an energetically feasible approach to mitigating anthropogenic climate change}},
url = {http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0701816},
volume = {41},
year = {2007}
}
@article{ONeill2016,
abstract = {{\textless}p{\textgreater}Projections of future climate change play a fundamental role in improving understanding of the climate system as well as characterizing societal risks and response options. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) is the primary activity within Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Projection (CMIP6) that that will provide multi-model climate projections based on alternative scenarios of future emissions and land-use changes produced with integrated assessment models. In this paper, we describe ScenarioMIP's objectives, experimental design, and its relation to other activities within CMIP6. The ScenarioMIP design is one component of a larger scenario process that aims to facilitate a wide range of integrated studies across the climate science, integrated assessment modelling, and impacts, adaptation and vulnerability communities, and will form an important part of the evidence base in the next IPCC assessment. At the same time, it will provide the basis for investigating a number of targeted scientific questions that are especially relevant to scenario-based analysis, including the role of specific forcings such as land use and aerosols, the effect of a peak and decline in forcing, the relative contributions to uncertainty from scenarios, climate models, and internal variability, and long-term climate system outcomes beyond the 21st century. To serve this wide range of scientific communities and address these questions, a design has been identified consisting of eight alternative 21st century scenarios plus one large initial condition ensemble and a set of long-term extensions, divided into two tiers defined by relative priority. Some of these scenarios will also provide a basis for variants planned to be run in other CMIP6-endorsed MIPs to investigate questions related to specific forcings. Harmonized, spatially explicit emissions and land-use scenarios generated with integrated assessment models will be provided to participating climate modeling groups by late 2016, with climate model projections expected to be available within the 2018{\&}ndash;2020 time frame.{\textless}/p{\textgreater}},
author = {O'Neill, Brian C. and Tebaldi, Claudia and {Van Vuuren}, Detlef P. and Eyring, Veronika and Friedlingstein, Pierre and Hurtt, George and Knutti, Reto and Kriegler, Elmar and Lamarque, Jean Francois and Lowe, Jason and Meehl, Gerald A. and Moss, Richard and Riahi, Keywan and Sanderson, Benjamin M.},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016},
isbn = {1991-959X},
issn = {19919603},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development},
title = {{The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6}},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Taylor2015a,
author = {Taylor, Lyla L and Quirk, Joe and Thorley, Rachel M S and Kharecha, Pushker A and Hansen, James and Ridgwell, Andy and Lomas, Mark R and Banwart, Steve A and Beerling, David J},
chapter = {402},
doi = {10.1038/nclimate2882},
isbn = {1758-678X},
journal = {Nature Climate Change},
number = {4},
pages = {402--406},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
title = {{Enhanced weathering strategies for stabilizing climate and averting ocean acidification}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2882},
volume = {6},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Crandell2011,
abstract = {The possible utility of Bayesian methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research has been repeatedly suggested but insufficiently investigated. In this project, we developed and used a Bayesian method for synthesis, with the goal of identifying factors that influence adherence to HIV medication regimens. We investigated the effect of 10 factors on adherence. Recognizing that not all factors were examined in all studies, we considered standard methods for dealing with missing data and chose a Bayesian data aug-mentation method. We were able to summarize, rank, and compare the effects of each of the 10 factors on medication adherence. This is a promising methodological development in the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research.},
author = {Crandell, Jamie L. and Voils, Corrine I. and Chang, YunKyung and Sandelowski, Margarete},
doi = {10.1007/s11135-010-9375-z},
isbn = {9780470656389},
issn = {0033-5177},
journal = {Quality {\&} Quantity},
pmid = {21572970},
title = {{Bayesian data augmentation methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research findings}},
year = {2011}
}
@inproceedings{Strefler2015,
address = {Abu Dhabi},
author = {Strefler, Jessica and Bauer, Nico and Amann, Thorben and Kriegler, Elmar and Hartmann, Jens},
booktitle = {International Energy Workshop},
title = {{Enhanced weathering and BECCS - are carbon dioxide removal technologies complements or substitutes?}},
url = {http://www.irena.org/EventDocs/Session{\_}4{\_}Parallel{\_}E{\_}Jessica{\_}Strefler{\_}Long{\_}abstract.pdf},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Hulme2016,
author = {Hulme, Mike},
doi = {10.1038/nclimate2939},
issn = {1758-678X},
journal = {Nature Clim. Change},
pages = {222--224},
title = {{1.5°C and climate research after the Paris Agreement}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2939},
volume = {6},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Moss2010a,
abstract = {Advances in the science and observation of climate change are providing a clearer understanding of the inherent variability of Earth's climate system and its likely response to human and natural influences. The implications of climate change for the environment and society will depend not only on the response of the Earth system to changes in radiative forcings, but also on how humankind responds through changes in technology, economies, lifestyle and policy. Extensive uncertainties exist in future forcings of and responses to climate change, necessitating the use of scenarios of the future to explore the potential consequences of different response options. To date, such scenarios have not adequately examined crucial possibilities, such as climate change mitigation and adaptation, and have relied on research processes that slowed the exchange of information among physical, biological and social scientists. Here we describe a new process for creating plausible scenarios to investigate some of the most challenging and important questions about climate change confronting the global community.},
annote = {Moss, Richard H
Edmonds, Jae A
Hibbard, Kathy A
Manning, Martin R
Rose, Steven K
van Vuuren, Detlef P
Carter, Timothy R
Emori, Seita
Kainuma, Mikiko
Kram, Tom
Meehl, Gerald A
Mitchell, John F B
Nakicenovic, Nebojsa
Riahi, Keywan
Smith, Steven J
Stouffer, Ronald J
Thomson, Allison M
Weyant, John P
Wilbanks, Thomas J
eng
England
2010/02/12 06:00
Nature. 2010 Feb 11;463(7282):747-56. doi: 10.1038/nature08823.},
author = {Moss, R H and Edmonds, J A and Hibbard, K A and Manning, M R and Rose, S K and van Vuuren, D P and Carter, T R and Emori, S and Kainuma, M and Kram, T and Meehl, G A and Mitchell, J F and Nakicenovic, N and Riahi, K and Smith, S J and Stouffer, R J and Thomson, A M and Weyant, J P and Wilbanks, T J},
doi = {10.1038/nature08823},
isbn = {1476-4687 (Electronic)0028-0836 (Linking)},
journal = {Nature},
keywords = {*Global Warming/prevention {\&} control/statistics {\&},Ecology/*trends,Human Activities,Risk Assessment,Vehicle Emissions,Wg II},
mendeley-tags = {Wg II},
number = {7282},
pages = {747--756},
pmid = {20148028},
title = {{The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment}},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20148028},
volume = {463},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Kriegler2016,
author = {Kriegler, Elmar and Mouratiadou, Ioanna and Luderer, Gunnar and Edmonds, Jae and Edenhofer, Ottmar},
doi = {10.1007/s10584-016-1667-4},
issn = {1573-1480},
journal = {Climatic Change},
pages = {1--6},
title = {{Introduction to the RoSE special issue on the impact of economic growth and fossil fuel availability on climate protection}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1667-4},
volume = {136},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Wilson2009,
author = {Wilson, S A and Dipple, G M and Power, I M and Thom, J M and Anderson, R G and Raudsepp, M and Gabites, J E and Southam, G},
isbn = {0361-0128},
journal = {Economic Geology},
keywords = {british-columbia,c-14 data,co2,hydromagnesite,magnesium-carbonate,nesquehonite,oxygen-isotope fractionation,stable-isotope,tailings,weathering products},
language = {English},
number = {1},
pages = {95--112},
title = {{Carbon Dioxide Fixation within Mine Wastes of Ultramafic-Hosted Ore Deposits: Examples from the Clinton Creek and Cassiar Chrysotile Deposits, Canada}},
volume = {104},
year = {2009}
}
@article{MacDowell2017,
abstract = {To offset the cost associated with CO2 capture and storage (CCS), there is growing interest in finding commercially viable end-use opportunities for the captured CO2. In this Perspective, we discuss the potential contribution of carbon capture and utilization (CCU). Owing to the scale and rate of CO2 production compared to that of utilization allowing long-term sequestration, it is highly improbable the chemical conversion of CO2 will account for more than 1{\%} of the mitigation challenge, and even a scaled-up enhanced oil recovery (EOR)-CCS industry will likely only account for 4-8{\%}. Therefore, whilst CO2-EOR may be an important economic incentive for some early CCS projects, CCU may prove to be a costly distraction, financially and politically, from the real task of mitigation.},
author = {{Mac Dowell}, Niall and Fennell, Paul S. and Shah, Nilay and Maitland, Geoffrey C.},
doi = {10.1038/nclimate3231},
isbn = {1758-678X 1758-6798},
issn = {1758-678X},
journal = {Nature Climate Change},
keywords = {4.3.6,CCUS,For FOD,Sabine},
mendeley-tags = {4.3.6,CCUS,For FOD,Sabine},
number = {4},
pages = {243--249},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
title = {{The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change}},
url = {http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate3231},
volume = {7},
year = {2017}
}
@article{Riahi2015,
abstract = {This paper provides an overview of the AMPERE modeling comparison project with focus on the implications of near-term policies for the costs and attainability of long-term climate objectives. Nine modeling teams participated in the project to explore the consequences of global emissions following the proposed policy stringency of the national pledges from the Copenhagen Accord and Canc{\'{u}}n Agreements to 2030. Specific features compared to earlier assessments are the explicit consideration of near-term 2030 emission targets as well as the systematic sensitivity analysis for the availability and potential of mitigation technologies. Our estimates show that a 2030 mitigation effort comparable to the pledges would result in a further “lock-in” of the energy system into fossil fuels and thus impede the required energy transformation to reach low greenhouse-gas stabilization levels (450 ppm CO2e). Major implications include significant increases in mitigation costs, increased risk that low stabilization targets become unattainable, and reduced chances of staying below the proposed temperature change target of 2 °C in case of overshoot. With respect to technologies, we find that following the pledge pathways to 2030 would narrow policy choices, and increases the risks that some currently optional technologies, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) or the large-scale deployment of bioenergy, will become “a must” by 2030.},
author = {Riahi, Keywan and Kriegler, Elmar and Johnson, Nils and Bertram, Christoph and den Elzen, Michel and Eom, Jiyong and Schaeffer, Michiel and Edmonds, Jae and Isaac, Morna and Krey, Volker and Longden, Thomas and Luderer, Gunnar and M{\'{e}}jean, Aur{\'{e}}lie and McCollum, David L and Mima, Silvana and Turton, Hal and van Vuuren, Detlef P and Wada, Kenichi and Bosetti, Valentina and Capros, Pantelis and Criqui, Patrick and Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem and Kainuma, Mikiko and Edenhofer, Ottmar},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016},
issn = {0040-1625},
journal = {Technological Forecasting and Social Change},
keywords = {Copenhagen pledges Climate policy AMPERE Mitigatio},
pages = {8--23},
title = {{Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals}},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162513002539},
volume = {90, Part A},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Ford2016a,
abstract = {The capacity to collect and analyze massive amounts of data is transforming research in the natural and social sciences (1). And yet, the climate change adaptation community has largely overlooked these developments. Here, we examine how “big data” can inform adaptation research and decision-making and outline what's needed from the adaptation community to maximize this opportunity. We contend that careful application of big data could revolutionize our understanding of how to manage the risks of climate change.
Anonymized records of cell-phone use could in principle enable the large-scale tracing of people's movements in the wake of a climate change-related disaster. Image courtesy of Shutterstock/Athi Aachawaradt.
Although a consistent definition is lacking, there is agreement that big data are characterized by the increasing volume, variety, and velocity of data streams (2, 3). Climate science has long used large datasets to understand the functioning of the climate system, but the field has been slow to use the passively generated information from digital devices and services that characterize big data (4). In the human dimensions community, big data have rarely been used, aside from studies measuring public opinion on climate change based on social media posts. Despite this neglect, vast amounts of geocoded data on human–environment interactions relevant to adaptation already exist digitally and are being added daily. Such data are not limited to the developed world, with widespread global cell phone coverage and social media use for example (5). Potential adaptation applications of these data are numerous.
Vulnerability research provides essential information for adaptation decision-making by identifying and characterizing who and what are vulnerable to climate change, to what risks, why, and over what timescales. The vulnerability field has expanded considerably over the last decade, although many gaps in understanding vulnerability processes and drivers remain—particularly concerning the real-time nature of human–environment {\ldots}
[↵][1]3To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: james.ford{\{}at{\}}mcgill.ca.
[1]: {\#}xref-corresp-1-1},
author = {Ford, James D and Tilleard, Simon E and Berrang-Ford, Lea and Araos, Malcolm and Biesbroek, Robbert and Lesnikowski, Alexandra C and MacDonald, Graham K and Hsu, Angel and Chen, Chen and Bizikova, Livia},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1614023113},
issn = {1091-6490},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
pmid = {27679837},
title = {{Opinion: Big data has big potential for applications to climate change adaptation.}},
year = {2016}
}
@unpublished{Borras2010,
author = {Borras, S. and Franco, J},
institution = {Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies Working Paper Series},
pages = {1--39},
title = {{Towards a broader view of the politics of global land grab: rethinking land issues, reframing resistance}},
year = {2010}
}
@techreport{Caldecott2015,
abstract = {The Stranded Assets Programme at the University of Oxford's Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment was established in 2012 to understand environment-related risks driving asset stranding in different sectors and systemically. We research the materiality of environment-related risks over time, how different risks might be interrelated, and the potential impacts of stranded assets on investors, businesses, regulators, and policymakers. We also work with partners to develop strategies to manage the consequences of environment-related risks and stranded assets.},
author = {Caldecott, B. and Lomax, G. and Workman, M. and {Caldecott, B.; Lomax, G.; Workman}, M.},
institution = {Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment.},
pages = {37},
title = {{Stranded Carbon Assets and Negative Emissions Technologies}},
year = {2015}
}
@book{Dale2010,
address = {Washington, DC, USA},
author = {Dale, V. H. and Kline, K. L. and Wiens, J. and Fargione, J.},
publisher = {Ecological Society of America},
title = {{Biofuels: implications for land use and biodiversity}},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Creutzig2017a,
abstract = {{\textless}p{\textgreater}Despite being currently under-represented in IPCC reports, PV generation represents a growing share of power generation. This Perspective argues that underestimating PV potential led to suboptimal integration measures and that specific deployment strategies for emerging e{\&}hellip;{\textless}/p{\textgreater}},
author = {Creutzig, Felix and Agoston, Peter and Goldschmidt, Jan Christoph and Luderer, Gunnar and Nemet, Gregory and Pietzcker, Robert C.},
doi = {10.1038/nenergy.2017.140},
issn = {2058-7546},
journal = {Nature Energy},
keywords = {Climate,Energy modelling,Solar energy,change mitigation},
month = {aug},
number = {9},
pages = {17140},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
title = {{The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change}},
url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy2017140},
volume = {2},
year = {2017}
}
@article{Popp2011,
author = {Popp, Alexander and Dietrich, Jan Philipp and Lotze-Campen, Hermann and Klein, David and Bauer, Nico and Krause, Michael and Beringer, Tim and Gerten, Dieter and Edenhofer, Ottmar},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034017},
issn = {1748-9326},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
month = {jul},
number = {3},
pages = {034017},
publisher = {IOP Publishing},
title = {{The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system}},
url = {http://stacks.iop.org/1748-9326/6/i=3/a=034017?key=crossref.a2656c08649c5f8b7418b37f3dd063a4},
volume = {6},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Renforth2017,
author = {Renforth, Phil and Henderson, Gideon},
isbn = {1944-9208},
journal = {Reviews of Geophysics},
publisher = {Wiley Online Library},
title = {{Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration}},
year = {2017}
}
@article{McGlashan2012,
author = {McGlashan, Niall and Shah, Nilay and Caldecott, Ben and Workman, Mark},
doi = {10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.004},
issn = {09575820},
journal = {Process Safety and Environmental Protection},
keywords = {Overview NETs},
mendeley-tags = {Overview NETs},
month = {nov},
number = {6},
pages = {501--510},
publisher = {Institution of Chemical Engineers},
title = {{High-level techno-economic assessment of negative emissions technologies}},
volume = {90},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Gonzalez2016,
author = {Gonz{\'{a}}lez, Miriam Ferrer and Ilyina, Tatiana},
doi = {10.1002/2016GL068576},
isbn = {1944-8007},
journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
keywords = {0793 Biogeochemistry,1622 Earth system modeling,Earth system modeling,artificial ocean alkalinization},
number = {12},
pages = {6493--6502},
title = {{Impacts of artificial ocean alkalinization on the carbon cycle and climate in Earth system simulations}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068576},
volume = {43},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Lackner2016,
abstract = {In their Perspective “The trouble with negative emissions” (14 October, p. [182][1] ), K. Anderson and G. Peters assert that negative-emissions technologies are an “unjust and high-stakes gamble.” This characterization would sideline negative-emissions technologies and remove potentially},
author = {Lackner, Klaus S and Aines, Roger and Atkins, Stephen and AtKisson, Alan and Barrett, Scott and Barteau, Mark and Braun, Robert J and Brouwer, Jack and Broecker, Wallace and Browne, Joshua B and Darton, Richard and Deich, Noah and Edmonds, James and Eisenberger, Peter and Fennell, Paul S and Flynn, Peter and Fox, Tim and Friedmann, S Julio and Gerrard, Michael and Gibbins, Jon and van der Giesen, Coen and Goldberg, David S and Graves, Christopher and Gupta, Raghubir and Hanemann, Michael and Keith, David and Kleijn, Rene and Kramer, Gert Jan and Kruger, Tim and Mazzotti, Marco and Meinrenken, Christoph J and Palmore, G Tayhas R and Park, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) and Putnam, Aaron and Rao, Vikram and Rau, Greg H and Rayner, Steve and Rittman, Bruce E and Sachs, Jeffrey D and Sarewitz, Daniel and Schlosser, Peter and Severinghaus, Jeffrey P and Stechel, Ellen B and Steinfeld, Aldo and Thomas, Cary E and Turkenburg, Wim C and Anderson, Kevin and Peters, Glen},
doi = {10.1126/science.aal2432},
journal = {Science},
number = {6313},
pages = {714},
title = {{No Title}},
volume = {354},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Smith2012b,
abstract = {Virtually all global energy forecasts include an expectation that bioenergy will be a substantial future energy source. However, the scale of this potential resource remains poorly understood because of uncertain land availability and yield expectations. Here, we used climate-constrained, satellite-derived net primary productivity data computed for 110 million square kilometers of terrestrial plant production as an upper-envelope constraint on primary bioenergy potential (PBP). We estimated the maximum PBP to realistically range from 12{\%} to 35{\%} of 2009 global primary energy consumption, with yield potential ranging from 6.6 to 18.8 megajoules per square meter per year—roughly four times lower than previous evaluations. Our results highlight many recent bioenergy evaluations as overoptimistic, which we attribute to a failure to adequately apply biophysical constraints in estimates of yield potential. We do not advocate bioenergy production at the levels reported in this analysis; instead, we simply report the ceiling for PBP based on current planetary productivity.},
author = {Smith, W. Kolby and Zhao, Maosheng and Running, Steven W.},
doi = {10.1525/bio.2012.62.10.11},
isbn = {00063568},
issn = {00063568},
journal = {BioScience},
keywords = {Bioenergy,a renewable energy,bioenergy,carbon,emissions,energy,energy security continue to,global,land use,of bioenergy,rise in the production,source with the potential,stimulate an unprecedented,to reduce greenhouse gas},
mendeley-tags = {Bioenergy},
number = {10},
pages = {pp. 911--922},
title = {{Global Bioenergy Capacity as Constrained by Observed Biospheric Productivity Rates}},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2012.62.10.11 https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-lookup/doi/10.1525/bio.2012.62.10.11},
volume = {62},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Chen2013,
author = {Chen, Chen and Tavoni, Massimo},
doi = {10.1007/s10584-013-0714-7},
issn = {0165-0009},
journal = {Climatic Change},
month = {may},
number = {1},
pages = {59--72},
publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
title = {{Direct air capture of CO2 and climate stabilization: A model based assessment}},
volume = {118},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Rogelj2016a,
author = {Rogelj, Joeri and Knutti, Reto},
doi = {10.1038/ngeo2668},
issn = {1752-0894},
journal = {Nature Geosci},
pages = {187--189},
title = {{Geosciences after Paris}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2668},
volume = {9},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Friedlingstein2006,
abstract = {Abstract Eleven coupled climate–carbon cycle models used a common protocol to study the coupling between climate change and the carbon cycle. The models were forced by historical emissions and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) A2 anthropogenic emissions of CO2 for the 1850–2100 time period. For each model, two simulations were performed in order to isolate the impact of climate change on the land and ocean carbon cycle, and therefore the climate feedback on the atmospheric CO2 concentration growth rate. There was unanimous agreement among the models that future climate change will reduce the efficiency of the earth system to absorb the anthropogenic carbon perturbation. A larger fraction of anthropogenic CO2 will stay airborne if climate change is accounted for. By the end of the twenty-first century, this additional CO2 varied between 20 and 200 ppm for the two extreme models, the majority of the models lying between 50 and 100 ppm. The higher CO2 levels led to an additional climate warming ranging between 0.1° and 1.5°C. All models simulated a negative sensitivity for both the land and the ocean carbon cycle to future climate. However, there was still a large uncertainty on the magnitude of these sensitivities. Eight models attributed most of the changes to the land, while three attributed it to the ocean. Also, a majority of the models located the reduction of land carbon uptake in the Tropics. However, the attribution of the land sensitivity to changes in net primary productivity versus changes in respiration is still subject to debate; no consensus emerged among the models.},
author = {Friedlingstein, P and Cox, P and Betts, R and Bopp, L and von Bloh, W and Brovkin, V and Cadule, P and Doney, S and Eby, M and Fung, I and Bala, G and John, J and Jones, C and Joos, F and Kato, T and Kawamiya, M and Knorr, W and Lindsay, K and Matthews, H D and Raddatz, T and Rayner, P and Reick, C and Roeckner, E and Schnitzler, K.-G. and Schnur, R and Strassmann, K and Weaver, A J and Yoshikawa, C and Zeng, N},
doi = {10.1175/jcli3800.1},
journal = {Journal of Climate},
pages = {3337--3353},
title = {{Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison}},
url = {http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI3800.1},
volume = {19},
year = {2006}
}
@article{Rogelj2013b,
annote = {10.1038/nclimate1758},
author = {Rogelj, Joeri and McCollum, David L and O'Neill, Brian C and Riahi, Keywan},
doi = {http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n4/abs/nclimate1758.html#supplementary-information},
issn = {1758-678X},
journal = {Nature Clim. Change},
pages = {405--412},
title = {{2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2°C}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1758},
volume = {3},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Kaiser2000,
author = {Kaiser, Jocelyn},
journal = {Science},
month = {may},
number = {5468},
pages = {942--943},
title = {{Panel Estimates Possible Carbon 'Sinks'}},
volume = {288},
year = {2000}
}
@incollection{Ciais2013a,
address = {Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA},
author = {Ciais, Philippe and Sabine, Christopher and Bala, Govindasamy and Bopp, L. and Brovkin, V. and Canadell, J. and Chhabra, A. and DeFries, R. and Galloway, J. and Heimann, M. and Jones, C. and {Le Qu{\'{e}}r{\'{e}}}, C and Myneni, RB R.B. and Piao, S. and Thornton, P. and Qin, D and Plattner, G-k and Tignor, M and Allen, SK and Boschung, J and Nauels, A and Xia, Y and Bex, V and Midgley, PM and Ciais, Philippe and Sabine, Christopher and Bala, Govindasamy and Qu{\'{e}}r{\'{e}}, C. Le and Myneni, RB R.B. and Piao, S. and Thornton, P. and {Le Qu{\'{e}}r{\'{e}}}, C and Myneni, RB R.B. and Piao, S. and Thornton, P. and Qin, D and Plattner, G-k and Tignor, M and Allen, SK and Boschung, J and Nauels, A and Xia, Y and Bex, V and Midgley, PM and Ciais, Philippe and Sabine, Christopher and Bala, Govindasamy},
booktitle = {Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change},
editor = {Stocker, T.F. and {D. Qin} and {G.-K. Plattner} and {M. Tignor} and {S.K. Allen} and {J. Boschung} and {A. Nauels} and {Y. Xia} and {V. Bex} and {P.M. Midgley}},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
title = {{Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles}},
url = {https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5{\_}Chapter06{\_}FINAL.pdf},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Hauck2016,
author = {Hauck, Judith and K{\"{o}}hler, Peter and Wolf-Gladrow, Dieter and V{\"{o}}lker, Christoph},
chapter = {024007},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/024007},
isbn = {1748-9326},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
number = {2},
title = {{Iron fertilisation and century-scale effects of open ocean dissolution of olivine in a simulated CO2removal experiment}},
volume = {11},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Lal2013a,
abstract = {World soils, a large reservoir of reactive carbon, moderate the global carbon cycle, atmospheric chemistry, radioactive forcing and ecosystem services; as such, soil carbon sequestration is important in limiting global warming to 2 degrees C. Among uncertainties are emissions from soils and permafrost, the CO2 fertilization effect, silicate weathering, the fate of eroded carbon, the efficiency of natural sinks, the permanence of carbon sequestered in soil and measurements of changes in soil carbon over short periods. Adoption of proven technologies can sequester carbon at the rate of 500-1000 kg/ha/year in croplands, 50-500 kg/ha/year in grazing lands, 500-1000 kg/ha/year in forestlands and 5-10 kg/ha/year of pedogenic carbonates in arid lands. Soil carbon is stabilized though deep placement, interaction with clays and the formation of stable aggregates. Adoption of recommended practices can be promoted by payments for ecosystems services. Researchable priorities include understanding trends of principal drivers, quantifying feedbacks related to climate change and impacts on ecosystem services.},
author = {Lal, Rattan},
doi = {10.4155/cmt.13.31},
isbn = {1758-3004},
issn = {1758-3004},
journal = {Carbon Management},
number = {4},
pages = {439--462},
title = {{Soil carbon management and climate change}},
url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.4155/cmt.13.31},
volume = {4},
year = {2013}
}
@inproceedings{Dooley2005,
abstract = {This chapter presents the results that indicate a large and variably distributed North American storage capacity of at least 3,800 gigatones of carbon dioxide (GtCO2), with deep saline formations accounting for the majority of this capacity. A geospatial and techno-economic database of 2,082 anthropogenic CO2 point sources in North America, each with annual emissions greater than 100,000 tones of CO2, was also refined. By computing a series of pairwise cost-minimizing decisions for these CO2 sources and potential geological-storage reservoirs, a CO2-storage cost curve for North America was calculated that includes the cost of transporting CO2 from the plant gate to a selected storage reservoir, the cost of injecting it into the underground formation, and any offsetting revenue associated with resulting enhanced hydrocarbon recovery, yielding a classic, positively sloping supply curve. Sensitivities examined for this CO2-storage cost curve focus on: high/low oil and gas prices; the maximum allowed distance between source and reservoir; and, for storage in value-added reservoirs, the infrastructure costs associated with CO2-driven hydrocarbon recovery. {\textcopyright} 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
address = {Vancouver, Canada},
author = {Dooley, James J.J. and Dahowski, R. T. and Davidson, C. L. and Bachu, S. and Gupta, N. and Gale, J.},
booktitle = {Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7},
doi = {10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50060-4},
isbn = {9780080447049},
number = {August},
pages = {593--601},
publisher = {Elsevier},
title = {{A CO2-storage supply curve for North America and its implications for the deployment of carbon dioxide capture and storage systems}},
year = {2005}
}
@article{Edenhofer2015b,
abstract = {{\textcopyright} 2015, Centre for Economic Policy Research. All rights reserved. With very high risk of severe, widespread and irreversible impacts globally due to unabated anthropogenic climate change, we argue in this chapter that the 2°C limit can be justified by the synthesis of available scientific evidence as an application of the precautionary principle. In principle, the risks of mitigation differ fundamentally from the risks of climate change in terms of their nature, timescale, magnitude and persistence. Humankind has the technological means to solve the problem. However, the challenges of stringent mitigation action are enormous and have been increasing over the last decade because of the ongoing renaissance of coal, which does not allow for a decoupling of economic and population growth from emissions. Keeping a greater than 66{\%} probability of staying below the 2°C limit, for example, would require current emission levels to be reduced by 40-70{\%} by 2050, and emission levels of zero and below by the end of the 21st century. This requires a large-scale transformation in the way we produce and use energy, as well as how we use land. The most fundamental challenges are the oversupply of fossil fuels and the risks associated with negative emissions technologies, or high bioenergy deployment. A further delay in mitigation action substantially increases the difficulty of, and narrows the options for, this transformation. Delays are associated with a growing dependence on negative emissions technologies as well as higher mitigation costs in the long run. In the near term, a fundamental departure from the business-as-usual development is required. Therefore, triggering short-term climate policy action is instrumental for any reasonable long-term climate goal. While the institutional challenges are tantamount, there are multiple rationales for pricing carbon and introducing complementary policies.},
author = {Edenhofer, O. and Kadner, S. and von Stechow, C. and Minx, J.C.},
issn = {16078616},
journal = {Geneva Reports on the World Economy},
title = {{Beyond the 2°C limit: Facing the economic and institutional challenges}},
year = {2015}
}
@article{VonStechow2015,
abstract = {Achieving a truly sustainable energy transition requires progress across multiple dimensions beyond climate change mitigation goals. This article reviews and synthesizes results from disparate strands of literature on the coeffects of mitigation to inform climate policy choices at different governance levels. The literature documents many potential cobenefits of mitigation for nonclimate objectives, such as human health and energy security, but little is known about their overall welfare implications. Integrated model studies highlight that climate policies as part of well-designed policy packages reduce the overall cost of achieving multiple sustainability objectives. The incommensurability and uncertainties around the quantification of coeffects become, however, increasingly pervasive the more the perspective shifts from sectoral and local to economy wide and global, the more objectives are analyzed, and the more the results are expressed in economic rather than nonmonetary terms. Different strings of evidence highlight the role and importance of energy demand reductions for realizing synergies across multiple sustainability objectives.},
author = {von Stechow, Christoph and McCollum, David and Riahi, Keywan and Minx, Jan and Kriegler, Elmar and van Vuuren, Detlef P. and Jewell, Jessica and Robledo-Abad, Carmenza and Hertwich, Edgar and Tavoni, Massimo and Mirasgedis, Sevastianos and Lah, Oliver and Roy, Joyashree and Mulugetta, Yacob and Dubash, Navroz K. and Bollen, Johannes C and {\"{U}}rge-Vorsatz, Diana and Edenhofer, Ottmar},
doi = {10.1146/annurev-environ-021113-095626},
isbn = {1543-5938},
issn = {1543-5938},
journal = {Annual Review of Environment and Resources},
pages = {363--394},
title = {{Integrating Global Climate Change Mitigation Goals with Other Sustainability Objectives: A Synthesis}},
volume = {40},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Brennan2010,
author = {Brennan, Liam and Owende, Philip},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009},
issn = {1364-0321},
journal = {Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews},
keywords = {Bioenergy,Biomass recovery,CO sequestration,Conversion,Microalgae,Photobioreactor},
number = {2},
pages = {557--577},
title = {{Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products}},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032109002408},
volume = {14},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Edenhofer2015a,
abstract = {How can assessments of environmental policy issues be policy-relevant without being policy-prescriptive? The predominant technocratic and decisionist responses to this question misleadingly assume that value-neutral scientific recommendations for public policy means, or even objectives, are possible. On the other end of the spectrum, the literature on democratic and pragmatic models of expertise in policy often does not satisfactorily explain what researchers can contribute to public discourses surrounding disputed, value-laden policy objectives and means. Building on John Dewey's philosophy, this article develops the “pragmatic-enlightened model” (PEM) of assessment making, which refines the existing pragmatic models. It is used to some extent by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. According to the PEM's policy assessment methodology, policy objectives and their means can only be evaluated in light of the practical consequences of the means. Learning about the secondary effects, side effects and synergies of the best means may require a revaluation of the policy objectives, for instance, regarding the use of bioenergy for climate mitigation. Following the PEM, assessments would—based on a thorough problem analysis—explore alternative policy pathways, including their diverse practical consequences, overlaps and trade-offs, in cooperation with stakeholders. Such an arduous interdisciplinary cartography of multiple objectives, multi-functional policy means and the broad range of their quantitative and qualitative practical consequences may face considerable practical challenges and uncertainty. Yet, it could make assessments more policy-relevant and less prescriptive, and could effectively support a learning process about the political solution space.},
author = {Edenhofer, Ottmar and Kowarsch, Martin},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.017},
issn = {1462-9011},
journal = {Environmental Science {\&} Policy},
keywords = {Environmental assessment Public policy analysis Me},
pages = {56--64},
title = {{Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments}},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115000660},
volume = {51},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Hartmann2008,
author = {Hartmann, J and Kempe, S},
doi = {10.1007/s00114-008-0434-4},
edition = {2008/08/30},
isbn = {0028-1042 (Print)0028-1042 (Linking)},
journal = {Naturwissenschaften},
keywords = {*Weather,Calcium Carbonate/analysis,Carbon Dioxide/*analysis,Carbonates/analysis,Climate,Environmental Monitoring,Geologic Sediments/analysis,Greenhouse Effect},
number = {12},
pages = {1159--1164},
pmid = {18754090},
title = {{What is the maximum potential for CO2 sequestration by "stimulated" weathering on the global scale?}},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18754090},
volume = {95},
year = {2008}
}
@misc{Ford2015,
abstract = {A post-2015 climate agreement will require systematic approaches for tracking adaptation progress across Parties to the UNFCC. A number of steps need to be taken to improve adaptation measurement and reporting.},
author = {Ford, J. D. and Berrang-Ford, L. and Biesbroek, R. and Araos, M. and Austin, S. E. and Lesnikowski, A.},
booktitle = {Nature Climate Change},
doi = {10.1038/nclimate2744},
isbn = {1758-678X},
issn = {17586798},
title = {{Adaptation tracking for a post-2015 climate agreement}},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Minx2018i,
author = {Minx, Jan C and Lamb, William F and Callaghan, Max W and Fuss, Sabine and Hilaire, J{\'{e}}r{\^{o}}me and Lenzi, Dominic and Nemet, Gregory and Creutzig, Felix and Amann, Thorben and Beringer, Tim and {de Oliveira Garcia}, Wagner and Hartmann, Jens and Khanna, Tarun and Luderer, Gunnar and Nemet, Gregory F and Rogelj, Joeri and Rogers, Sophia and Smith, Pete and Vicentre, Juans Luis Vincente and Wilcox, Jennifer and {del Mar Zamora}, Maria},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
title = {{Negative emissions: Part 1 - Research landscape, ethics and synthesis}},
volume = {accepted},
year = {2018}
}
@unpublished{Roberts2010,
author = {Roberts, M. J. and Schlenker, W.},
institution = {NBER Working Paper},
title = {{The US biofuel mandate and world food prices: an econometric analysis of the demand and supply of calories.}},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Lorenz2014,
abstract = {The increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations due to emissions from fossil fuel combustion is contributing to recent climate change which is among the major challenges facing the world. Agroforestry systems can contribute to slowing down those increases and, thus, contribute to climate change mitigation. Agroforestry refers to the production of crop, livestock, and tree biomass on the same area of land. The soil organic carbon (SOC) pool, in particular, is the only terrestrial pool storing some carbon (C) for millennia which can be deliberately enhanced by agroforestry practices. Up to 2.2 Pg C (1 Pg = 1015 g) may be sequestered above- and belowground over 50 years in agroforestry systems, but estimations on global land area occupied by agroforestry systems are particularly uncertain. Global areas under tree intercropping, multistrata systems, protective systems, silvopasture, and tree woodlots are estimated at 700, 100, 300, 450, and 50 Mha, respectively. The SOC storage in agroforestry systems is also uncertain and may amount up to 300 Mg C ha−1 to 1 m depth. Here, we review and synthesize the current knowledge about SOC sequestration processes and their management in agroforestry systems. The main points are that (1) useful C sequestration in agroforestry systems for climate change mitigation must slow or even reverse the increase in atmospheric concentration of CO2 by storing some SOC for millennia, (2) soil disturbance must be minimized and tree species with a high root biomass-to-aboveground biomass ratio and/or nitrogen-fixing trees planted when SOC sequestration is among the objectives for establishing the agroforestry system, (3) sequestration rates and the processes contributing to the stabilization of SOC in agroforestry soils need additional data and research, (4) retrospective studies are often missing for rigorous determination of SOC and accurate evaluation of effects of different agroforestry practices on SOC sequestration in soil profiles, and (5) the long-term SOC storage is finite as it depends on the availability of binding sites, i.e., the soil's mineral composition and depth. Based on this improved knowledge, site-specific SOC sequestering agroforestry practices can then be developed.},
author = {Lorenz, Klaus and Lal, Rattan},
doi = {10.1007/s13593-014-0212-y},
isbn = {1359301402},
issn = {17730155},
journal = {Agronomy for Sustainable Development},
keywords = {Agroforestry systems,Carbon sequestration,Climate change mitigation,Root-derived carbon,Soil organic carbon},
number = {2},
pages = {443--454},
title = {{Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. A review}},
volume = {34},
year = {2014}
}
@misc{Buchanan2014,
abstract = {While access to electricity affects health positively, combustion of coal in power plants causes well-documented adverse health effects. We review respiratory, cardiovascular, reproductive, and neurologic health outcomes associated with exposure to coal-fired power plant emissions. We also discuss population-level health effects of coal combustion and its role in climate change. Our review of scientific studies suggests that those, we present here can be used to inform energy policy.},
author = {Buchanan, Susan and Burt, Erica and Orris, Peter},
booktitle = {Journal of Public Health Policy},
doi = {10.1057/jphp.2014.16},
isbn = {0197-5897},
issn = {1745655X},
keywords = {air pollution,coal,electricity generation,health effects},
pmid = {24831676},
title = {{Beyond black lung: Scientific evidence of health effects from coal use in electricity generation}},
year = {2014}
}
@book{IPCC2013a,
address = {Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA},
author = {IPCC},
doi = {10.1017/CBO9781107415324},
editor = {Qin, D and Plattner, G.-K. and Tignor, M and Allen, S K and Boschung, J and Nauels, A and Xia, Y and Bex, V and Midgley, P M},
isbn = {ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0},
pages = {1535},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
title = {{Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change}},
url = {http://www.climatechange2013.org},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Joos1991,
author = {Joos, F and Siegenthaler, U and Sarmiento, J L},
doi = {10.1029/91gb00878},
isbn = {0886-6236},
journal = {Global Biogeochemical Cycles},
language = {English},
number = {2},
pages = {135--150},
title = {{Possible Effects of Iron Fertilization in the Southern Ocean on Atmospheric Co2 Concentration}},
volume = {5},
year = {1991}
}
@incollection{Yamasaki2002,
address = {Boston, MA},
author = {Yamasaki, Akihiro and Fujii, Minoru and Kakizawa, Masayuki and Yanagisawa, Yukio},
booktitle = {Environmental Challenges and Greenhouse Gas Control for Fossil Fuel Utilization in the 21st Century},
doi = {10.1007/978-1-4615-0773-4_14},
editor = {Maroto-Valer, M Mercedes and Song, Chunshan and Soong, Yee},
isbn = {978-1-4615-0773-4},
keywords = {Yamasaki2002},
mendeley-tags = {Yamasaki2002},
pages = {189--201},
publisher = {Springer US},
title = {{Reduction Process of CO2 Emissions by Treating With Waste Concrete via an Artificial Weathering Process}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0773-4{\_}14},
year = {2002}
}
@article{Dooley2013,
abstract = {Whether there is sufficient geologic CO2 storage capacity to allow CCS to play a significant role in mitigating climate change has been the subject of debate since the 1990s. This paper presents a meta- Analysis of a large body of recently published literature to derive updated estimates of the global deep geologic storage resource as well as the potential demand for this geologic CO2 storage resource over the course of this century. This analysis reveals that, for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation scenarios that have end-of-century atmospheric CO2 concentrations of between 350 ppmv and 725 ppmv, the average demand for deep geologic CO2 storage over the course of this century is between 410 GtCO2 and 1,670 GtCO2. The literature summarized here suggests that - depending on the stringency of criteria applied to calculate storage capacity - global geologic CO2 storage capacity could be: 35,300 GtCO2 of "theoretical" capacity; 13,500 GtCO2 of "effective" capacity; 3,900 GtCO2, of "practical" capacity; and 290 GtCO2 of "matched" capacity for the few regions where this narrow definition of capacity has been calculated. The cumulative demand for geologic CO2 storage is likely quite small compared to global estimates of the deep geologic CO2 storage capacity, and therefore, a "lack" of deep geologic CO2 storage capacity is unlikely to be an impediment for the commercial adoption of CCS technologies in this century.},
author = {Dooley, James J.J.},
doi = {10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.429},
isbn = {1301314676},
issn = {18766102},
journal = {Energy Procedia},
pages = {5141--5150},
publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},
title = {{Estimating the supply and demand for deep geologic CO2 storage capacity over the course of the 21st century: A meta-analysis of the literature}},
volume = {37},
year = {2013}
}
@incollection{Kraxner2015,
address = {Cham},
author = {Kraxner, Florian and Nordstr{\"{o}}m, Eva-Maria},
booktitle = {The Future Use of Nordic Forests},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-14218-0_5},
pages = {63--81},
publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
title = {{Bioenergy Futures: A Global Outlook on the Implications of Land Use for Forest-Based Feedstock Production}},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-14218-0{\_}5},
year = {2015}
}
@article{Reilly2012,
author = {Reilly, John and Melillo, Jerry and Cai, Yongxia and Kicklighter, David and Gurgel, Angelo and Paltsev, Sergey and Cronin, Timothy and Sokolov, Andrei and Schlosser, Adam},
doi = {10.1021/es2034729},
journal = {Environ. Sci. Technol.},
pages = {5672--5679},
title = {{Using Land To Mitigate Climate Change : Hitting the Target , Recognizing the Trade-offs}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es2034729},
volume = {46},
year = {2012}
}
@incollection{Coelho2012,
address = {Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria},
author = {Coelho, Suani T. and Agbenyega, Olivia and Agostini, Astrid and Erb, Karl-Heinz and Haberl, Helmut and Hoogwijk, Monique and Lal, Rattan and Lucon, Oswaldo and Masera, Omar and Moreira, Jose Roberto},
isbn = {9781 10700 5198 hardback 9780 52118 2935 paperback},
pages = {1459--1526},
shorttitle = {Chapter 20 - Land and Water: Linkages to Bioenergy},
title = {{Chapter 20 - Land and Water: Linkages to Bioenergy}},
url = {www.globalenergyassessment.org},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Azar2006c,
abstract = {Abstract The capture and storage of CO2 from combustion of fossil fuels is gaining attraction as a means to deal with climate change. CO2 emissions from biomass conversion processes can also be captured. If that is done, biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage (BECS) would become a technology that removes CO2 from the atmosphere and at the same time deliver CO2-neutral energy carriers (heat, electricity or hydrogen) to society. Here we present estimates of the costs and conversion efficiency of electricity, hydrogen and heat generation from fossil fuels and biomass with CO2 capture and storage. We then insert these technology characteristics into a global energy and transportation model (GET 5.0), and calculate costs of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentration at 350 and 450 ppm. We find that carbon capture and storage technologies applied to fossil fuels have the potential to reduce the cost of meeting the 350 ppm stabilisation targets by 50{\%} compared to a case where these technologies are not available and by 80{\%} when BECS is allowed. For the 450 ppm scenario, the reduction in costs is 40 and 42{\%}, respectively. Thus, the difference in costs between cases where BECS technologies are allowed and where they are not is marginal for the 450 ppm stabilization target. It is for very low stabilization targets that negative emissions become warranted, and this makes BECS more valuable than in cases with higher stabilization targets. Systematic and stochastic sensitivity analysis is performed. Finally, BECS opens up the possibility to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. But this option should not be seen as an argument in favour of doing nothing about the climate problem now and then switching on this technology if climate change turns out to be a significant problem. It is not likely that BECS can be initiated sufficiently rapidly at a sufficient scale to follow this path to avoiding abrupt and serious climate changes if that would happen.},
author = {Azar, Christian and Lindgren, Kristian and Larson, Eric and M{\"{o}}llersten, Kenneth},
doi = {10.1007/s10584-005-3484-7},
isbn = {0165-0009$\backslash$r1573-1480},
issn = {01650009},
journal = {Climatic Change},
number = {1-3},
pages = {47--79},
title = {{Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass - Costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere}},
volume = {74},
year = {2006}
}
@article{Rogelj2011,
annote = {10.1038/nclimate1258},
author = {Rogelj, Joeri and Hare, William and Lowe, Jason and van Vuuren, Detlef P and Riahi, Keywan and Matthews, Ben and Hanaoka, Tatsuya and Jiang, Kejun and Meinshausen, Malte},
doi = {http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n8/abs/nclimate1258.html#supplementary-information},
issn = {1758-678X},
journal = {Nature Clim. Change},
pages = {413--418},
title = {{Emission pathways consistent with a 2°C global temperature limit}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258},
volume = {1},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Riahi2017,
author = {Riahi, Keywan and van Vuuren, Detlef P and Kriegler, Elmar and Edmonds, Jae and O'Neill, Brian C and Fujimori, Shinichiro and Bauer, Nico and Calvin, Katherine and Dellink, Rob and Fricko, Oliver and Lutz, Wolfgang and Popp, Alexander and Cuaresma, Jesus Crespo and Kc, Samir and Leimbach, Marian and Jiang, Leiwen and Kram, Tom and Rao, Shilpa and Emmerling, Johannes and Ebi, Kristie and Hasegawa, Tomoko and Havlik, Petr and Humpen{\"{o}}der, Florian and {Da Silva}, Lara Aleluia and Smith, Steve and Stehfest, Elke and Bosetti, Valentina and Eom, Jiyong and Gernaat, David and Masui, Toshihiko and Rogelj, Joeri and Strefler, Jessica and Drouet, Laurent and Krey, Volker and Luderer, Gunnar and Harmsen, Mathijs and Takahashi, Kiyoshi and Baumstark, Lavinia and Doelman, Jonathan C and Kainuma, Mikiko and Klimont, Zbigniew and Marangoni, Giacomo and Lotze-Campen, Hermann and Obersteiner, Michael and Tabeau, Andrzej and Tavoni, Massimo},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009},
issn = {0959-3780},
journal = {Global Environmental Change},
keywords = {Shared Socioeconomic Pathways SSP Climate change R},
pages = {153--168},
title = {{The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview}},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378016300681},
volume = {42},
year = {2017}
}
@book{Hertel1997,
author = {Hertel, T.W.},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
title = {{Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications}},
year = {1997}
}
@article{Mollersten2004,
abstract = {This paper investigates the impact of combining CO2 capture and storage with alternative systems for biomass-based combined heat and power production (CHP) in Kraft pulp and paper mills. We compare heat, power, and CO2 balances of systems with alternative configurations of the CHP and CO2-capture systems. Because the captured CO2 comes from renewable biomass, the studied systems yield negative CO2 emissions. It is shown that pulp mills and integrated pulp and paper mills have the potential to become net exporters of biomass-based electricity while at the same time removing CO2 from the atmosphere on a net basis. The study shows that that the overall best CO2 abatement is achieved when CO2 capture is carried out within a biomass integrated gasifier with combined cycle where the syngas undergoes a CO-shift reaction. This configuration combines efficient energy conversion with a high CO2 capture efficiency. Furthermore, cost curves are constructed, which show how the cost of CO2 capture and storage in pulp and paper mills depends on system configuration and the CO2 transportation distance. {\textcopyright} 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
author = {M{\"{o}}llersten, Kenneth and Gao, Lin and Yan, Jinyue and Obersteiner, Michael},
doi = {10.1016/j.renene.2004.01.003},
isbn = {0960-1481},
issn = {09601481},
journal = {Renewable Energy},
keywords = {Biomass,Black liquor,CO2 capture,Carbon-negative production,Electricity production,Pulp and paper mills},
month = {jul},
number = {9},
pages = {1583--1598},
pmid = {1111},
title = {{Efficient energy systems with CO2 capture and storage from renewable biomass in pulp and paper mills}},
url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096014810400014X},
volume = {29},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Smith2010k,
abstract = {A key challenge for humanity is how a future global population of 9 billion can all be fed healthily and sustainably. Here, we review how competition for land is influenced by other drivers and pressures, examine land-use change over the past 20 years and consider future changes over the next 40 years. Competition for land, in itself, is not a driver affecting food and farming in the future, but is an emergent property of other drivers and pressures. Modelling studies suggest that future policy decisions in the agriculture, forestry, energy and conservation sectors could have profound effects, with different demands for land to supply multiple ecosystem services usually intensifying competition for land in the future. In addition to policies addressing agriculture and food production, further policies addressing the primary drivers of competition for land (population growth, dietary preference, protected areas, forest policy) could have significant impacts in reducing competition for land. Technologies for increasing per-area productivity of agricultural land will also be necessary. Key uncertainties in our projections of competition for land in the future relate predominantly to uncertainties in the drivers and pressures within the scenarios, in the models and data used in the projections and in the policy interventions assumed to affect the drivers and pressures in the future.},
author = {Smith, Pete and Gregory, Peter J and {Van Vuuren}, Detlef and Obersteiner, Michael and Havl{\'{i}}k, Petr and Rounsevell, Mark and Woods, Jeremy and Stehfest, Elke and Bellarby, Jessica},
doi = {10.1098/rstb.2010.0127},
isbn = {0962-8436},
issn = {1471-2970},
journal = {Phil Trans R Soc},
keywords = {agriculture,competition for land,d3174,forestry,land use,policy},
mendeley-tags = {d3174},
month = {sep},
number = {1554},
pages = {2941--2957},
pmid = {20713395},
publisher = {The Royal Society},
title = {{Competition for land}},
translator = {D3174},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20713395 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC2935113},
volume = {365},
year = {2010}
}
@misc{McCollum2018,
abstract = {The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals provide guide-posts to society as it attempts to respond to an array of pressing challenges. One of these challenges is energy; thus, the SDGs have become paramount for energy policy-making. Yet, while governments throughout the world have already declared the SDGs to be “integrated and indivisible”, there are still knowledge gaps around how the interactions between the energy SDG targets and those of the non-energy-focused SDGs might play out in different contexts. In this Perspective, we report on a systematic assessment of the relevant energy literature, which we conducted to better our understanding of key energy-related interactions between SDGs. Our analysis indicates, first, that positive interactions between the SDGs outweigh the negative ones, both in number and magnitude. Second, of relevance for the scientific community, in order to fill knowledge gaps in critical areas, there is an urgent need for inter-disciplinary research geared toward developing new data, scientific tools, and fresh perspectives. Third, of relevance for policy-making, wider efforts to promote policy coherence and integrated assessments are required to address potential policy spillovers across sectors, sustainability domains, and geographic and temporal boundaries. ‘Doing energy right' is fundamental to the success of the SDGs, and energy scientists have a major role to play in offering guidance to the discourse.},
author = {McCollum, David L. and Echeverri, Luis Gomez and Busch, Sebastian and Pachauri, Shonali and Parkinson, Simon and Rogelj, Joeri and Krey, Volker and Minx, Jan C. and Nilsson, M{\aa}ns and Stevance, Anne Sophie and Riahi, Keywan},
booktitle = {Environmental Research Letters},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3},
issn = {17489326},
keywords = {Energy,Integrated assessment,Sustainable development goals,Systems analysis},
title = {{Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages}},
year = {2018}
}
@article{LeQuere2018,
abstract = {{\textless}p{\textgreater}Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO{\textless}sub{\textgreater}2{\textless}/sub{\textgreater}) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the {\textless}q{\textgreater}global carbon budget{\textless}/q{\textgreater} – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. CO{\textless}sub{\textgreater}2{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} emissions from fossil fuels and industry ({\textless}i{\textgreater}E{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}FF{\textless}/sub{\textgreater}) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change ({\textless}i{\textgreater}E{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}LUC{\textless}/sub{\textgreater}), mainly deforestation, are based on land-cover change data and bookkeeping models. The global atmospheric CO{\textless}sub{\textgreater}2{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth ({\textless}i{\textgreater}G{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}ATM{\textless}/sub{\textgreater}) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO{\textless}sub{\textgreater}2{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} sink ({\textless}i{\textgreater}S{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}OCEAN{\textless}/sub{\textgreater}) and terrestrial CO{\textless}sub{\textgreater}2{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} sink ({\textless}i{\textgreater}S{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}LAND{\textless}/sub{\textgreater}) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance ({\textless}i{\textgreater}B{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}IM{\textless}/sub{\textgreater}), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1{\textless}i{\textgreater}$\sigma${\textless}/i{\textgreater}. For the last decade available (2007–2016), {\textless}i{\textgreater}E{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}FF{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} was 9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, {\textless}i{\textgreater}E{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}LUC{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, {\textless}i{\textgreater}G{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}ATM{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} 4.7 ± 0.1 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, {\textless}i{\textgreater}S{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}OCEAN{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} 2.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, and {\textless}i{\textgreater}S{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}LAND{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} 3.0 ± 0.8 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, with a budget imbalance {\textless}i{\textgreater}B{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}IM{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} of 0.6 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater} indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For year 2016 alone, the growth in {\textless}i{\textgreater}E{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}FF{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} was approximately zero and emissions remained at 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}. Also for 2016, {\textless}i{\textgreater}E{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}LUC{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, {\textless}i{\textgreater}G{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}ATM{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} was 6.1 ± 0.2 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, {\textless}i{\textgreater}S{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}OCEAN{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} was 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, and {\textless}i{\textgreater}S{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}LAND{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} was 2.7 ± 1.0 GtC yr{\textless}sup{\textgreater}−1{\textless}/sup{\textgreater}, with a small {\textless}i{\textgreater}B{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}IM{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} of −0.3 GtC. {\textless}i{\textgreater}G{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}ATM{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} continued to be higher in 2016 compared to the past decade (2007–2016), reflecting in part the high fossil emissions and the small {\textless}i{\textgreater}S{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}LAND{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} consistent with El Ni{\~{n}}o conditions. The global atmospheric CO{\textless}sub{\textgreater}2{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} concentration reached 402.8 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2016. For 2017, preliminary data for the first 6–9 months indicate a renewed growth in {\textless}i{\textgreater}E{\textless}/i{\textgreater}{\textless}sub{\textgreater}FF{\textless}/sub{\textgreater} of +2.0 {\%} (range of 0.8 to 3.0 {\%}) based on national emissions projections for China, USA, and India, and projections of gross domestic product (GDP) corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Qu{\'{e}}r{\'{e}} et al., 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). All results presented here can be downloaded from {\textless}a href="https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2017" target="{\_}blank"{\textgreater}https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2017{\textless}/a{\textgreater} (GCP, 2017).{\textless}/p{\textgreater}},
author = {{Le Qu{\'{e}}r{\'{e}}}, Corinne and Andrew, Robbie M. and Friedlingstein, Pierre and Sitch, Stephen and Pongratz, Julia and Manning, Andrew C. and {Ivar Korsbakken}, Jan and Peters, Glen P. and Canadell, Josep G. and Jackson, Robert B. and Boden, Thomas A. and Tans, Pieter P. and Andrews, Oliver D. and Arora, Vivek K. and Bakker, Dorothee C.E. and Barbero, Leticia and Becker, Meike and Betts, Richard A. and Bopp, Laurent and Chevallier, Fr{\'{e}}d{\'{e}}ric and Chini, Louise P. and Ciais, Philippe and Cosca, Catherine E. and Cross, Jessica and Currie, Kim and Gasser, Thomas and Harris, Ian and Hauck, Judith and Haverd, Vanessa and Houghton, Richard A. and Hunt, Christopher W. and Hurtt, George and Ilyina, Tatiana and Jain, Atul K. and Kato, Etsushi and Kautz, Markus and Keeling, Ralph F. and {Klein Goldewijk}, Kees and K{\"{o}}rtzinger, Arne and Landsch{\"{u}}tzer, Peter and Lef{\`{e}}vre, Nathalie and Lenton, Andrew and Lienert, Sebastian and Lima, Ivan and Lombardozzi, Danica and Metzl, Nicolas and Millero, Frank and Monteiro, Pedro M.S. and Munro, David R. and Nabel, Julia E.M.S. and Nakaoka, Shin Ichiro and Nojiri, Yukihiro and {Antonio Padin}, X. and Peregon, Anna and Pfeil, Benjamin and Pierrot, Denis and Poulter, Benjamin and Rehder, Gregor and Reimer, Janet and R{\"{o}}denbeck, Christian and Schwinger, J{\"{o}}rg and S{\'{e}}f{\'{e}}rian, Roland and Skjelvan, Ingunn and Stocker, Benjamin D. and Tian, Hanqin and Tilbrook, Bronte and Tubiello, Francesco N. and Laan-Luijkx, Ingrid T.Vander and Werf, Guido R.Vander and {Van Heuven}, Steven and Viovy, Nicolas and Vuichard, Nicolas and Walker, Anthony P. and Watson, Andrew J. and Wiltshire, Andrew J. and Zaehle, S{\"{o}}nke and Zhu, Dan},
doi = {10.5194/essd-10-405-2018},
isbn = {1866-3591},
issn = {18663516},
journal = {Earth System Science Data},
title = {{Global Carbon Budget 2017}},
year = {2018}
}
@incollection{Edmonds2007,
author = {Edmonds, James A. and Dooley, James J. and Kim, Son H. and Friedman, S. Julio and Wise, Marshall A.},
booktitle = {Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment},
chapter = {16},
editor = {Echlesinger, Michael E. and Kheshgi, Haroon S. and Smith, Joel and Chesnaye, F. De La and Reilly, John M. and Wilson, Tom and Kolstad, Charles},
month = {nov},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.},
title = {{TECHNOLOGY IN AN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODEL: THE POTENTIAL REGIONAL DEPLOYMENT OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL CO2 STABILIZATION}},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/922185},
year = {2007}
}
@article{Farrell2016a,
abstract = {Anthropogenic climate change represents a global threat to human well-being1–3 and ecosystem functioning4 . Yet despite its importance for science and policy, our understanding of the causes of widespread uncertainty and doubt found among the general public remains limited. The political and social processes driving such doubt and uncertainty are difficult to rigorously analyse, and research has tended to focus on the individual-level, rather than the larger institutions and social networks that produce and disseminate contrarian information. This study presents a new approach by using network science to uncover the institutional and corporate structure of the climate change counter-movement, and machine-learningtextanalysis toshowitsinfluenceinthenews media and bureaucratic politics. The data include a new social network of all known organizations and individuals promoting contrarian viewpoints, as well as the entirety of all written and verbal texts about climate change from 1993–2013 from everyorganization, threemajornews outlets, allUSpresidents, and every occurrence on the floor of the US Congress. Using network and computational text analysis, I find that the organizational power within the contrarian network, and the magnitude of semantic similarity, are both predicted by ties to elite corporate benefactors.},
author = {Farrell, Justin},
doi = {10.1038/nclimate2875},
file = {:home/max/Documents/library/dd307b9f16ccacc603192676346033a5d663.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1758-6798},
issn = {17586798},
journal = {Nature Climate Change},
title = {{Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement}},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Kreidenweis2016b,
author = {Kreidenweis, Ulrich and Humpen{\"{o}}der, Florian and Stevanovi{\'{c}}, Miodrag and Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon and Kriegler, Elmar and Lotze-Campen, Hermann and Popp, Alexander},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085001},
issn = {1748-9326},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
keywords = {d4250},
mendeley-tags = {d4250},
month = {aug},
number = {8},
pages = {085001},
publisher = {IOP Publishing},
title = {{Afforestation to mitigate climate change: impacts on food prices under consideration of albedo effects}},
translator = {D4250},
url = {http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085001/meta},
volume = {11},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Rihoux2006,
abstract = {During the past two decades, a set of systematic comparative case analysis techniques has been developing at a steady pace. During the last few years especially, the main initial technique, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), has been complemented by other related methods and techniques. The purpose of this article is to critically assess some main recent developments in this field. QCA and connected methods can be considered at two levels: as a research strategy and as a set of concrete techniques. The author first argues that such a strategy displays some decisive advantages in social science research, especially in small- and inter- mediate-Nresearch designs. Second, QCA as well as three other related techniques, namely multi-value QCA (MVQCA), fuzzy sets and MSDO/MDSO, are presented in brief, and some current debates with regard to these techniques are also summar- ized. In the third section, the article surveys recent contributions and ongoing efforts that have provided some advances in the application of these techniques, around five key issues: case selection and model specification; measurement, dichotomization and linkage with theory; contradictions and non-observed cases; the time and process dimension; and the confrontation or combination with other methods. Finally, the article discuss the potential for further development of these methods in social science research broadly defined},
author = {Rihoux, B.},
doi = {10.1177/0268580906067836},
isbn = {0268-5809},
issn = {0268-5809},
journal = {International Sociology},
title = {{Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research}},
year = {2006}
}
@article{Blei2010,
abstract = {In this article, we review probabilistic topic models: graphical models that can be used to summarize a large collection of documents with a smaller number of distributions over words. Those distributions are called "topics" because, when fit to data, they capture the salient themes that run through the collection. We describe both finite-dimensional parametric topic models and their Bayesian nonparametric counterparts, which are based on the hierarchical Dirichlet process (HDP). We discuss two extensions of topic models to time-series data-one that lets the topics slowly change over time and one that lets the assumed prevalence of the topics change. Finally, we illustrate the application of topic models to nontext data, summarizing some recent research results in image analysis.},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
arxivId = {1003.4916},
author = {Blei, David and Carin, Lawrence and Dunson, David},
doi = {10.1109/MSP.2010.938079},
eprint = {1003.4916},
isbn = {0805854185},
issn = {10535888},
journal = {IEEE Signal Processing Magazine},
pmid = {7789277},
title = {{Probabilistic topic models}},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Pehnt2009,
author = {Pehnt, Martin and Henkel, Johannes},
doi = {10.1016/J.IJGGC.2008.07.001},
issn = {1750-5836},
journal = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control},
month = {jan},
number = {1},
pages = {49--66},
publisher = {Elsevier},
title = {{Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage from lignite power plants}},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583608000650},
volume = {3},
year = {2009}
}
@article{Kriegler2013,
abstract = {The ability to directly remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere allows the decoupling of emissions and emissions control in space and time. We ask the question whether this unique feature of carbon dioxide removal technologies fundamentally alters the dynamics of climate mitigation pathways. The analysis is performed in the coupled energy-economy-climate model ReMIND using the bioenergy with CCS route as an application of CDR technology. BECCS is arguably the least cost CDR option if biomass availability is not a strongly limiting factor. We compare mitigation pathways with and without BECCS to explore the impact of CDR technologies on the mitigation portfolio. Effects are most pronounced for stringent climate policies where BECCS is a key technology for the effectiveness of carbon pricing policies. The decoupling of emissions and emissions control allows prolonging the use of fossil fuels in sectors that are difficult to decarbonize, particularly in the transport sector. It also balances the distribution of mitigation costs across future generations. CDR is not a silver bullet technology. The largest part of emissions reductions continues to be provided by direct mitigation measures at the emissions source. The value of CDR lies in its flexibility to alleviate the most costly constraints on mitigating emissions.},
author = {Kriegler, Elmar and Edenhofer, Ottmar and Reuster, Lena and Luderer, Gunnar and Klein, David},
doi = {10.1007/s10584-012-0681-4},
issn = {1573-1480},
journal = {Climatic Change},
pages = {45--57},
title = {{Is atmospheric carbon dioxide removal a game changer for climate change mitigation?}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0681-4},
volume = {118},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Jones2014,
author = {Jones, I S F},
chapter = {391},
doi = {10.1108/ijccsm-11-2012-0063},
isbn = {1756-8692},
journal = {International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management},
number = {4},
pages = {391--400},
title = {{The cost of carbon management using ocean nourishment}},
volume = {6},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Azar2013a,
abstract = {In order to meet stringent temperature targets, active removal of CO2 from the atmosphere may be required in the long run. Such negative emissions can be materialized when well-performing bioenergy systems are combined with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Here, we develop an integrated global energy system and climate model to evaluate the role of BECCS in reaching ambitious temperature targets. We present emission, concentration and temperature pathways towards 1.5 and 2 ° C targets. Our model results demonstrate that BECCS makes it feasible to reach temperature targets that are otherwise out of reach, provided that a temporary overshoot of the target is accepted. Additionally, stringent temperature targets can be met at considerably lower cost if BECCS is available. However, the economic benefit of BECCS nearly vanishes if an overshoot of the temperature target is not allowed. Finally, the least-cost emission pathway over the next 50 years towards a 1.5 ° C overshoot target with BECCS is almost identical to a pathway leading to a 2 ° C ceiling target. {\textcopyright} 2013 IOP Publishing Ltd.},
author = {Azar, Christian and Johansson, Daniel J a and Mattsson, Niclas},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034004},
isbn = {1748-9326},
issn = {1748-9326},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
keywords = {034004,8,available from stacks,climate change,energy systems,erl,integrated assessment models,iop,mmedia,negative emissions,org,s online supplementary data},
number = {3},
pages = {1--8},
title = {{Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage}},
url = {http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84885643388{\&}partnerID=tZOtx3y1},
volume = {8},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Bertram2018,
abstract = {{\textcopyright} 2018 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Meeting the 1.5 °C goal will require a rapid scale-up of zero-carbon energy supply, fuel switching to electricity, efficiency and demand-reduction in all sectors, and the replenishment of natural carbon sinks. These transformations will have immediate impacts on various of the sustainable development goals. As goals such as affordable and clean energy and zero hunger are more immediate to great parts of global population, these impacts are central for societal acceptability of climate policies. Yet, little is known about how the achievement of other social and environmental sustainability objectives can be directly managed through emission reduction policies. In addition, the integrated assessment literature has so far emphasized a single, global (cost-minimizing) carbon price as the optimal mechanism to achieve emissions reductions. In this paper we introduce a broader suite of policies - including direct sector-level regulation, early mitigation action, and lifestyle changes - into the integrated energy-economy-land-use modeling system REMIND-MAgPIE. We examine their impact on non-climate sustainability issues when mean warming is to be kept well below 2 °C or 1.5 °C. We find that a combination of these policies can alleviate air pollution, water extraction, uranium extraction, food and energy price hikes, and dependence on negative emissions technologies, thus resulting in substantially reduced sustainability risks associated with mitigating climate change. Importantly, we find that these targeted policies can more than compensate for most sustainability risks of increasing climate ambition from 2 °C to 1.5 °C.},
author = {Bertram, Christoph and Luderer, Gunnar and Popp, Alexander and Minx, Jan Christoph and Lamb, William F. and Stevanovi{\'{c}}, Miodrag and Humpen{\"{o}}der, Florian and Giannousakis, Anastasis and Kriegler, Elmar},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aac3ec},
issn = {17489326},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
keywords = {emission reduction policies,integrated assessment modeling,sustainable development goals (SDGs)},
title = {{Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5 °c mitigation scenarios}},
year = {2018}
}
@article{Farrell2016,
abstract = {Drawing on large-scale computational data and methods, this research demonstrates how polarization efforts are influenced by a patterned network of political and financial actors. These dynamics, which have been notoriously difficult to quantify, are illustrated here with a computational analysis of climate change politics in the United States. The comprehensive data include all individual and organizational actors in the climate change countermovement (164 organizations), as well as all written and verbal texts produced by this network between 1993–2013 (40,785 texts, more than 39 million words). Two main findings emerge. First, that organizations with corporate funding were more likely to have written and disseminated texts meant to polarize the climate change issue. Second, and more importantly, that corporate funding influences the actual thematic content of these polarization efforts, and the discursive prevalence of that thematic content over time. These findings provide new, and comprehensive, confirmation of dynamics long thought to be at the root of climate change politics and discourse. Beyond the specifics of climate change, this paper has important implications for understanding ideological polarization more generally, and the increasing role of private funding in determining why certain polarizing themes are created and amplified. Lastly, the paper suggests that future studies build on the novel approach taken here that integrates large-scale textual analysis with social networks. },
author = {Farrell, Justin},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1509433112},
isbn = {1509433112},
issn = {0027-8424},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
pmid = {26598653},
title = {{Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change}},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Power2013,
author = {Power, I M and Harrison, A L and Dipple, G M and Wilson, S A and Kelemen, P B and Hitch, M and Southam, G},
doi = {10.2138/rmg.2013.77.9},
isbn = {1529-6466},
journal = {Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry},
number = {1},
pages = {305--360},
title = {{Carbon Mineralization: From Natural Analogues to Engineered Systems}},
volume = {77},
year = {2013}
}
@techreport{UNFCCC2015b,
address = {United Nations Office. Geneva, Switzerland},
author = {UNFCCC},
institution = {United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change},
keywords = {4.2.3,For FOD,From ZOD,NDC},
language = {English},
mendeley-tags = {4.2.3,For FOD,From ZOD,NDC},
month = {dec},
publisher = {United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change},
title = {{Adoption of the Paris Agreement}},
url = {http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf},
year = {2015}
}
@article{C7EE02819A,
abstract = {CO2 capture and conversion to fuels using renewable energy is being promoted as a climate change mitigation measure that reduces fossil fuel use by effectively recycling carbon. We examine this claim{\{},{\}} first for a typical CO2 capture and utilization (CCU) system producing methanol (MeOH){\{},{\}} and then for a generalized system producing fuels from fossil carbon. The MeOH analysis shows CCU to be an inferior mitigation option compared to a system with CCS producing the same fuel without CO2 utilization. CCU also is far more costly. The generalized analysis further reveals that the mitigation potential of CCU for fuels production is limited to 50{\%} of the original emissions of the reference system without CCU. We further highlight that the main challenge to CCU cost reduction is not the CO2-to-fuel conversion step but the production of required carbon-free electricity at very low cost.},
author = {Abanades, J Carlos and Rubin, Edward S and Mazzotti, Marco and Herzog, Howard J},
doi = {10.1039/C7EE02819A},
journal = {Energy Environ. Sci.},
number = {12},
pages = {2491--2499},
publisher = {The Royal Society of Chemistry},
title = {{On the climate change mitigation potential of CO2 conversion to fuels}},
volume = {10},
year = {2017}
}
@article{lakyda2005opportunities,
author = {Lakyda, P I and Buksha, I F and Pasternak, V P},
journal = {UNASYLVA-FAO-},
number = {3},
pages = {32},
publisher = {UN FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION},
title = {{Opportunities for fulfilling Joint Implementation projects in forestry in Ukraine}},
volume = {56},
year = {2005}
}
@article{lal2010beyond,
author = {Lal, Rattan},
journal = {Food security},
number = {2},
pages = {169--177},
publisher = {Springer},
title = {{Beyond Copenhagen: mitigating climate change and achieving food security through soil carbon sequestration}},
volume = {2},
year = {2010}
}
@article{Zahariev2008,
author = {Zahariev, Konstantin and Christian, James R and Denman, Kenneth L},
chapter = {56},
doi = {10.1016/j.pocean.2008.01.007},
isbn = {00796611},
journal = {Progress in Oceanography},
number = {1},
pages = {56--82},
title = {{Preindustrial, historical, and fertilization simulations using a global ocean carbon model with new parameterizations of iron limitation, calcification, and N2 fixation}},
volume = {77},
year = {2008}
}
@misc{Chadwick1987,
abstract = {This chapter reviews the potential health problems that the adoption of coal conversion technologies may engender. In spite of the limited experience and information available in this field, it is prudent to explore this topic to gain insights into the factors that need to be monitored, the control technologies that may require incorporation into plant design, and the environmental standards that will need to be established. This is done against a background of the general health effects of present coal use technologies. Coal combustion may result in a wide range of substances being emitted to the atmosphere: particulates, sulfur dioxide (SO2), mono-nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), polycyclic organic matter (POM), and trace metals. Many of these are potential human health hazards. Health damage functions for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are the next most important in relation to coal combustion. NO2, being an oxidant, acts quite differently from the reducing sulfur-particulate mix. It is not highly correlated with sulfate incidence. As the coal conversion industry is in its infancy, there are few occupational or environmental health studies available. The chapter reviews these studies and discusses some approaches that have been proposed for environmental and occupational health protection.},
author = {Chadwick, M J and Highton, N H and LIindman, NILS},
booktitle = {Environmental Impacts of Coal Mining {\&} Utilization},
doi = {10.1016/B978-0-08-031427-3.50019-0},
isbn = {9780080314273},
title = {{Environmental Impacts of Coal Mining {\&} Utilization}},
year = {1987}
}
@article{Lal2004a,
abstract = {The increase in atmospheric concentration of CO2 by 31{\%} since 1750 from fossil fuel combustion and land use change necessitates identification of strategies for mitigating the threat of the attendant global warming. Since the industrial revolution, global emissions of carbon (C) are estimated at 270±30 Pg (Pg=petagram=1015 g=1 billion ton) due to fossil fuel combustion and 136±55 Pg due to land use change and soil cultivation. Emissions due to land use change include those by deforestation, biomass burning, conversion of natural to agricultural ecosystems, drainage of wetlands and soil cultivation. Depletion of soil organic C (SOC) pool have contributed 78±12 Pg of C to the atmosphere. Some cultivated soils have lost one-half to two-thirds of the original SOC pool with a cumulative loss of 30-40 Mg C/ha (Mg=megagram=106 g=1 ton). The depletion of soil C is accentuated by soil degradation and exacerbated by land misuse and soil mismanagement. Thus, adoption of a restorative land use and recommended management practices (RMPs) on agricultural soils can reduce the rate of enrichment of atmospheric CO2 while having positive impacts on food security, agro-industries, water quality and the environment. A considerable part of the depleted SOC pool can be restored through conversion of marginal lands into restorative land uses, adoption of conservation tillage with cover crops and crop residue mulch, nutrient cycling including the use of compost and manure, and other systems of sustainable management of soil and water resources. Measured rates of soil C sequestration through adoption of RMPs range from 50 to 1000 kg/ha/year. The global potential of SOC sequestration through these practices is 0.9±0.3 Pg C/year, which may offset one-fourth to one-third of the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 estimated at 3.3 Pg C/year. The cumulative potential of soil C sequestration over 25-50 years is 30-60 Pg. The soil C sequestration is a truly win-win strategy. It restores degraded soils, enhances biomass production, purifies surface and ground waters, and reduces the rate of enrichment of atmospheric CO2 by offsetting emissions due to fossil fuel. {\textcopyright} 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
author = {Lal, R.},
doi = {10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032},
isbn = {0016-7061},
issn = {00167061},
journal = {Geoderma},
keywords = {Conservation tillage,Cover cropping,Greenhouse effect,Mulch farming,Soil restoration,The global C cycle},
number = {1-2},
pages = {1--22},
pmid = {15608240},
title = {{Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change}},
volume = {123},
year = {2004}
}
@article{VanVuuren2011,
abstract = {The relationship between long-term climate goals and short/medium-term emission targets forms crucial information for the design of international climate policy. Since IPCC's 4th Assessment Report (AR4), a large number of new scenario studies have been published. This paper reviews this new literature and finds that there is more flexibility in the timing of short-term emission reductions compared to the earlier scenarios assessed by the AR4. For instance, the current literature suggests that a peak of emissions in 2020 and even 2030 would be consistent with limiting temperature change to about 2°C in the long term. The timing when emissions peak depends on whether negative emissions in the long-term can be achieved. The recent scenarios further indicate that global emissions by 2050 should be 40–80{\%} below 2000 levels. Above all, the paper argues that there is no clear, single “law” that would directly determine the required emissions levels in 2020, but that instead policy-makers need to consider trade-offs between the likelihood of achieving long-term targets, the short-term costs, and their expectation with respect to future technologies (and their possible failure). The higher flexibility might be important in finding acceptable agreements on international climate policy.},
author = {van Vuuren, Detlef P and Riahi, Keywan},
doi = {10.1007/s10584-010-0004-6},
issn = {1573-1480},
journal = {Climatic Change},
pages = {793--801},
title = {{The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-0004-6},
volume = {104},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Zeebe2005,
author = {Zeebe, R E},
doi = {10.1029/2005gl022449},
isbn = {0094-8276},
journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
number = {9},
title = {{Feasibility of ocean fertilization and its impact on future atmospheric CO2levels}},
volume = {32},
year = {2005}