You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
AI is as good as the context you provide it, regardless of it's architecture, weights, training, gpt-42 will be as good as the context you provide it.
screenpipe builds layers of abstractions on top of raw recordings. pipes create valuable contextual data that could be indexed and queried by other pipes, similar to how AI assistants use tools to access different knowledge bases. this proposal aims to standardize how pipes share and consume these contextual indexes.
problem
valuable contextual data is siloed within individual pipes
no standardized way to index and query cross-pipe data
missing opportunities for AI-driven context enrichment
current sharing methods are hacky
pipes reinvent the wheel for common patterns
proposed solution
create an indexes SDK that allows pipes to:
publish local indexes (abstracted data)
AI can autonomously query other pipes' indexes via tools / best AI engineering practices
subscribe to index updates
core indexes examples
// common index types that pipes can publish and consumetypeIndexTypes={// activity patterns'activity.summary': {interval: '5min'|'15min'|'1hour',timestamp: number,data: {tags: string[],summary: string,apps: string[],focus_level: number// 0-1}},// knowledge/notes'knowledge.chunk': {timestamp: number,data: {content: string,tags: string[],source: string,type: 'note'|'document'|'chat'|'email'}},// communication style'communication.style': {timestamp: number,data: {tone: string[],// ['formal', 'casual', 'technical']common_phrases: string[],writing_patterns: {avg_sentence_length: number,vocabulary_level: string}}},// task context'task.item': {timestamp: number,data: {title: string,status: 'todo'|'in_progress'|'done',priority: number,context: string,source: string}}}
example pipes & integrations
engineering assistant pipe
constengineeringPipe={asyncsuggestIssueComment(issueUrl: string){// get relevant technical contextconsttechContext=awaitpipe.indexes.query('knowledge.chunk',{timeRange: lastWeek,tags: ['technical','architecture']})// get user's communication styleconststyle=awaitpipe.indexes.query('communication.style',{timeRange: lastMonth})// get related tasksconsttasks=awaitpipe.indexes.query('task.item',{status: 'in_progress',tags: ['engineering']})returngenerateTechnicalComment(issueUrl,{context: techContext,
style,relatedTasks: tasks})}}
task extraction pipe
consttaskPipe={asyncextractTasks(){// analyze recent activityconstactivities=awaitpipe.indexes.query('activity.summary',{timeRange: lastHour})// get communication contextconstcommunications=awaitpipe.indexes.query('knowledge.chunk',{timeRange: lastHour,type: ['chat','email']})consttasks=identifyTasks(activities,communications)// publish new tasksawaitpipe.indexes.publish('task.item',tasks.map(t=>({timestamp: Date.now(),data: t})))}}
sales assistant pipe
constsalesPipe={asyncenhanceSalesCall(transcript: string){// get customer interaction historyconsthistory=awaitpipe.indexes.query('knowledge.chunk',{timeRange: lastMonth,tags: ['customer','sales']})// get product knowledgeconstproductKnowledge=awaitpipe.indexes.query('knowledge.chunk',{tags: ['product','features','pricing']})// get communication patternsconststyle=awaitpipe.indexes.query('communication.style',{timeRange: lastWeek})returngenerateSalesInsights(transcript,{
history,
productKnowledge,
style
})}}
linear.app integration pipe
constlinearPipe={asyncenhanceTicket(ticketId: string){// get engineering contextconsttechContext=awaitpipe.indexes.query('knowledge.chunk',{timeRange: lastWeek,tags: ['technical']})// get related tasksconsttasks=awaitpipe.indexes.query('task.item',{tags: ['engineering']})// get team activity patternsconstteamActivity=awaitpipe.indexes.query('activity.summary',{timeRange: lastDay,tags: ['engineering']})returngenerateTicketContext(ticketId,{
techContext,relatedTasks: tasks,
teamActivity
})}}
meeting summarizer pipe
constmeetingPipe={asyncgenerateSummary(meetingId: string){// get participant contextconstparticipants=awaitpipe.indexes.query('knowledge.chunk',{timeRange: lastMonth,tags: ['profile','background']})// get project contextconstprojectContext=awaitpipe.indexes.query('knowledge.chunk',{tags: ['project','objectives']})// get action itemsconsttasks=awaitpipe.indexes.query('task.item',{status: 'todo'})returngenerateMeetingSummary(meetingId,{
participants,
projectContext,pendingTasks: tasks})}}
what's the optimal storage strategy for different index types? should we just store everything as file (eg obsidian file-first approach) or can we just sqlite or such less lindy solutions?
how to handle data retention? what about memories from last 90 days?
should we add data transformation utilities?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
context
AI is as good as the context you provide it, regardless of it's architecture, weights, training, gpt-42 will be as good as the context you provide it.
screenpipe builds layers of abstractions on top of raw recordings. pipes create valuable contextual data that could be indexed and queried by other pipes, similar to how AI assistants use tools to access different knowledge bases. this proposal aims to standardize how pipes share and consume these contextual indexes.
problem
proposed solution
create an indexes SDK that allows pipes to:
core indexes examples
example pipes & integrations
technical considerations
implementation details
next steps
questions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: