Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse identifiers with "bis" suffix #20

Open
mico opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Parse identifiers with "bis" suffix #20

mico opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mico
Copy link
Contributor

mico commented Jul 10, 2023

I found some identifiers with "bis" suffix:

There are more, this is just few of them. The identifiers I looked into mentioned that it's "Extract from the Blue Book", maybe "bis" related to "Blue Book".

@ronaldtse
Copy link

Actually “bis” means “draft for next version”, so V.8 bis means the next version of V.8, which may or may not retain the name “V.8”. The IETF also uses this practice.

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

bis is Latin for "twice", and it is used in numbering like A is: in general 8 bis means "8A, number I've had to slot in between 8 and 9". You can keep going with Latin times adverbs— ter, quater, quinquies ... but we won't :)

@mico
Copy link
Contributor Author

mico commented Jul 21, 2023

bis is Latin for "twice", and it is used in numbering like A is: in general 8 bis means "8A, number I've had to slot in between 8 and 9". You can keep going with Latin times adverbs— ter, quater, quinquies ... but we won't :)

@ronaldtse should we convert "bis" to "A"?

@ronaldtse
Copy link

@mico we have to keep the “bis” as “bis”. Whatever the suffix is, we have to keep the original.

@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 21, 2023
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I was only mentioning 8A as a more familiar way of doing what 8 bis does.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants