From 9ae1ec33207c5a7c89b1f5c236d091bc894e9c21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Max Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:19:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update LITERATURE.md --- LITERATURE.md | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/LITERATURE.md b/LITERATURE.md index 6cf8bdc..41f0d84 100644 --- a/LITERATURE.md +++ b/LITERATURE.md @@ -1147,3 +1147,13 @@ Jan Rosenzweig Standard, PCA-based factor analysis suffers from a number of well known problems due to the random nature of pairwise correlations of asset returns. We analyse an alternative based on ICA, where factors are identified based on their non-Gaussianity, instead of their variance. Generalizations of portfolio construction to the ICA framework leads to two semi-optimal portfolio construction methods: a fat-tailed portfolio, which maximises return per unit of non-Gaussianity, and the hybrid portfolio, which asymptotically reduces variance and non-Gaussianity in parallel. For fat-tailed portfolios, the portfolio weights scale like performance to the power of 1/3, as opposed to linear scaling of Kelly portfolios; such portfolio construction significantly reduces portfolio concentration, and the winner-takes-all problem inherent in Kelly portfolios. For hybrid portfolios, the variance is diversified at the same rate as Kelly PCA-based portfolios, but excess kurtosis is diversified much faster than in Kelly, at the rate of n−2 compared to Kelly portfolios' n−1 for increasing number of components n. + +## Portfolio Optimization Rules beyond the Mean-Variance Approach [pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.08530) +Maxime Markov, Vladimir Markov + +In this paper, we revisit the relationship between investors' utility functions and portfolio allocation rules. We derive portfolio allocation rules for asymmetric Laplace distributed $ALD( \mu , \sigma , \kappa)$ returns and compare them with the mean-variance approach, which is based on Gaussian returns. We reveal that in the limit of small $\frac{\mu}{\sigma}$, the Markowitz contribution is accompanied by a skewness term. We also obtain the allocation rules when the expected return is a random normal variable in an average and worst-case scenarios, which allows us to take into account uncertainty of the predicted returns. An optimal worst-case scenario solution smoothly approximates between equal weights and minimum variance portfolio, presenting an attractive convex alternative to the risk parity portfolio. We address the issue of handling singular covariance matrices by imposing conditional independence structure on the precision matrix directly. Finally, utilizing a microscopic portfolio model with random drift and analytical expression for the expected utility function with log-normal distributed cross-sectional returns, we demonstrate the influence of model parameters on portfolio construction. This comprehensive approach enhances allocation weight stability, mitigates instabilities associated with the mean-variance approach, and can prove valuable for both short-term traders and long-term investors. + +## Optimal portfolio allocation with uncertain covariance matrix [pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.07478) +Maxime Markov, Vladimir Markov + +In this paper, we explore the portfolio allocation problem involving an uncertain covariance matrix. We calculate the expected value of the Constant Absolute Risk Aversion (CARA) utility function, marginalized over a distribution of covariance matrices. We show that marginalization introduces a logarithmic dependence on risk, as opposed to the linear dependence assumed in the mean-variance approach. Additionally, it leads to a decrease in the allocation level for higher uncertainties. Our proposed method extends the mean-variance approach by considering the uncertainty associated with future covariance matrices and expected returns, which is important for practical applications.