Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KNN benchmark tooling should also report "KNN Searcher RAM" #314

Open
mikemccand opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

KNN benchmark tooling should also report "KNN Searcher RAM" #314

mikemccand opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mikemccand
Copy link
Owner

[Spinoff from https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13651/]

With the various cool ways Lucene can now quantize KNN vectors (per-dimension scalar quantization, and the upcoming RabitQ and maybe other cool algos with time...), the "hot RAM" required for efficient searching is much lower than the index size because Lucene always keeps the original (float32 or byte) input vectors so KNN data structures can be recomputed accurately during segment merging.

Let's fix our KNN tooling to separately report "hot RAM" required (subtract the index storage needed for the original vectors).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant