Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think this uses a background thread to offload the plugin's processing to a second CPU core at the expense of a full buffer worth of latency. Something like this can potentially be a useful tool, but I think it is better implemented at the host level, like MOD's "portal": |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have heard from users of MOD devices that their NAM plugin has a buffered mode that reduces CPU a lot but of course adds latency. Is this something that can be added to your plugin and if so would like 48 samples (1ms) reduce the CPU a lot?
User abotte over at MOD forum reports that if he uses buffered mode the CPU usage of a NANO model goes from 78% to 18%.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions