-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MSL 4.1.0 Reference results Modelica.Electrical.Machines.Examples.SynchronousMachines.SMPM_NoLoad #4363
Comments
To answer this question. It is marked as
|
That sounds serious enough to warrant red coloring, if the reference result doesn't even contain the variables one expects to test... |
Well, it is neither red nor green, but inclonclusive indicating that the comparison test could not be completed with the data available. There is yellow color also in other places used, e.g., if simulation time exceeds some threshold, I guess. |
Well, csv-compare writes a failed marker filer indeed: compare_failed.log whereas the report marks it as UNTESTED: |
We are only counting failed comparison. We can introduce a yellow instead of a gray field for this, if this makes you happy ... |
That sounds better than gray. It is a serious issue with the test or regression result that needs solving, so it would be nice if the report can clearly mark it so it stands out. |
Fixed via reference update See also discussion in in /issues/4333 |
The test of Modelica.Electrical.Machines.Examples.SynchronousMachines.SMPM_NoLoad on the LTX server now shows green. |
After #4031 the reference signals for
Modelica.Electrical.Machines.Examples.SynchronousMachines.SMPM_NoLoad
changed, so we need new reference results.I also question why the test is not marked red in the report: https://www.ltx.de/download/MA/Compare_MSL_v4.1.0/Compare/Modelica/testrun_report.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: