-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathTRAIN_00996.eml
26 lines (21 loc) · 1.03 KB
/
TRAIN_00996.eml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NoneNone> This make me wonder about the relative protection of smart cards. They have
> an internal procession unit around 4MHz. Can we consider them as trusted
> hardware ? The ability to ship smart cards periodicaly uppon cashing of a
> monthly subscription fee would not raise too much the cost of "renting" the
> system. Smart card do their own self encryption. Can they be used to
> decrypt data needed by the system ? The input of the system could me mangled
> and the would keep a reference of how long it was in service.
>
> This sounds really feasible but I may be totaly wrong. I may also be wrong
> about the safety of a smart card.
>
> What do you think ?
That's similar to using hard-locks (either the old parallel, or the new
usb).
The problem is that that piece of hardware is trustworthy, but the rest of
the PC isn't, so a cracker just needs to simulate the lock/smart card, or
peek at the executable after the lock has been deactivated.
Regards,
Luciano Rocha
--
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.