New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

464XLAT should cite RFC6877 #4

Open

momoka0122y opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 0 comments

Owner

momoka0122y commented Jan 4, 2023 •

edited

Loading

I recommend the following change:
[...] However, using literal IPv4
addresses instead of DNS names will fail (unless 464XLAT [RFC8683] is
used).
-->
[...] However, using literal IPv4
addresses instead of DNS names will fail (unless 464XLAT [RFC6877] is
used [RFC8683]).

Rationale: 464XLAT is defined in RFC6877, and the use case is described
in RFC8683.

from Gabor LENCSE
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/LXXuGxJrBa61aH_rJ-UsG2xlyIY/

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

momoka0122y added a commit that referenced this issue


          464XLAT should cite RFC6877. #4

cb1eaa6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment