We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
你好,我用raft+pervfi|interpolation X2,跑了一段视频,生成的插帧图片虚影比较严重(下图中,第2和第4张有虚影的是生成的),想问一下,是不是我设置哪里有问题?
对比{raft+pervfi,gma+pervfi,gmflow+pervfi}这几种,目前觉得gma+pervfi效果比raft+pervfi好,gmflow+pervfi耗时最大。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
这里取决于光流的准确性,比如在这个case里gma的光流准确性更好,获得的图像质量也就相应地有所提升。我的建议是如果你发现你的使用场景里有一个比较稳定且效果好的光流估计网络,就用这个网络级联PerVFI,进行简单的fine-tune,从而获得最佳体验。
Sorry, something went wrong.
好的,我试一下,万分感谢!
No branches or pull requests
你好,我用raft+pervfi|interpolation X2,跑了一段视频,生成的插帧图片虚影比较严重(下图中,第2和第4张有虚影的是生成的),想问一下,是不是我设置哪里有问题?
对比{raft+pervfi,gma+pervfi,gmflow+pervfi}这几种,目前觉得gma+pervfi效果比raft+pervfi好,gmflow+pervfi耗时最大。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: