-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Namecoin developer GPG pubkeys for Gitian use #81
Comments
ACK! All this sounds great to me! How can I help? |
I don't see why not. |
Should we remove the Bitcoin developers' GPG keys from our repo, or have them coexist with ours? Seems kind of weird to keep keys of people who aren't involved in the project in our repo. However, since Luke-Jr did do Gitian builds of Namecoin Core for Eligius, I'd say that if we remove the Bitcoin developers' keys, Luke's key should remain. Opinions? Also I checked; @midnightmagic 's key isn't in the Bitcoin repo. |
Also tagging @brandonrobertz , the newest member of the Namecoin Gitian club. |
I looked around and it seems fairly split between other coins. Litecoin keeps the bitcoin dev keys. Dogecoin has their own. I think it makes sense to leave folks who are even somewhat active and remove those we don't know or trust. $0.02 |
For anyone who isn't aware, the reason I haven't yet committed my PGP pubkey is because I'm intending to create new keys in an offline VM. This was delayed by DWS, but I'm most likely going to be able to create new keys in the next week or so. I hope I'm not blocking anyone's progress? |
I added my key at the top of the list, where I think we should put Namecoin developers' keys. I left the Bitcoin developers in there for now (see also namecoin#81).
I've added my own key for now in #223. @JeremyRand, I think you have a new key by now - please create a PR adding it. (Others feel free as well.) I'm happy to keep Bitcoin developers for now - but we can also remove everyone except Luke if others prefer that. |
I added my key at the top of the list, where I think we should put Namecoin developers' keys. I left the Bitcoin developers in there for now (see also namecoin#81).
aba314e Add my GPG key to the list of Gitian signing keys. (Daniel Kraft) Pull request description: I added my key at the top of the list, where I think we should put Namecoin developers' keys. I left the Bitcoin developers in there for now (see also #81). Tree-SHA512: 0317794685bb2fb70a7fd5026cb669a4e63acfe95b4d366fc7426477ea852dbb96269b126848c2a6d03cd6b91269121bfbb87816cced433bf27bdba8ba7e9066
From #namecoin-meeting:
Details are briefly mentioned at https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin-core/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#verify-other-gitian-builders-signatures-to-your-own-optional .
The 4 Namecoin developers I'm aware of who use Gitian are me, @josephbisch, @jonasbits, and @midnightmagic . @ryancdotorg has also expressed interest in the past. Are you guys okay with adding your GPG pubkeys to the namecoin-core repo? (I guess midnight's is already there, since he does Gitian builds for Bitcoin.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: