Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracker: Default Handlers for Primitive Datatypes #18

Open
Citrullin opened this issue Oct 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Tracker: Default Handlers for Primitive Datatypes #18

Citrullin opened this issue Oct 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Citrullin
Copy link
Collaborator

I think a lot of potential use cases can already be covered by defining default handler functions for each primitive datatype and affordance operation type. The following table can be used to track the implementation progress.

Operation string number integer boolean null
readproperty
writeproperty
observeproperty
unobserveproperty
invokeaction
subscribeevent
unsubscribeevent

I guess dealing with arrays and especially objects will be a lot more difficult which is why I omitted them in the table above. As arrays can potentially contain any type, I guess it would be the best to model them as linked lists?

@Citrullin Citrullin added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant