-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CPS wrong output voltage #1338
Comments
Nice to hear it (mostly) works for you :) As for the issue at hand, can you please share a bit more about the configuration (which driver, some debug logs per troubleshooting hints in the documentation)? So far I'd have two guesses: we are either mapping a wrong value indeed (whether our community's mistake, or firmware differences over time so "they" report a data point at a different node than the one which worked before), or in case of USB connections it may be or not be an issue with LogMin/LogMax processing per #1040 and related trail. |
Of course, here is log, ups.conf and udev rules I'm not alone - for example #1191 - nominal voltage 120, output voltage 265 or #520 - 4 years old comment: input.transfer.high: 139 But it differs - transfer high is 139 and output 140 |
FWIW, I'm seeing this as well on a CP1500PFCLCD. The reported output voltage fluctuates around 136v. The display on the UPS itself, however, reports the expected output voltage ~120v. Let me know if there's any other info I can provide that may be helpful.
|
Hi, I' think your reported output voltage doesn't fluctuate. It's (reported) constantly 136V or, sometimes, zero. It's probably some issue in your monitoring software, IMO. Your UPS display is right. Your input voltage is 120, your output voltage is 120V too. If this type of UPS ("line interactive") is not running on battery, the current simply pass thru; output is the same as input. The UPS start acting when input voltage is bellow low transfer setting or above high transfer setting or if there is an power outage (zero input power is, of course, bellow low transfer setting).
On line 4, there is ReportID 0x10 offset 16 - HighVoltageTransfer 253 Someone tried PowerPanel? What reports PowerPanel? |
Just in case, would you have a chance to build a recent NUT source from
github and check in-situ if the current drivers also mis-report that? (and
what is the expected value range for you - circa 220-240V or 110-127V?)
Thanks.
…
and from the server
Init SSL without certificate database
battery.charge: 100
battery.charge.low: 10
battery.charge.warning: 20
battery.mfr.date: CPS
battery.runtime: 525
battery.runtime.low: 300
battery.type: PbAcid
battery.voltage: 13.6
battery.voltage.nominal: 12
device.mfr: CPS
device.model: OR500LCDRM1Ua
device.serial: GA4JW2000855
device.type: upsdriver.name: usbhid-ups
driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30
driver.parameter.pollinterval: 15
driver.parameter.port: auto
driver.parameter.synchronous: no
driver.version: 2.7.4
driver.version.data: CyberPower HID 0.4
driver.version.internal: 0.41
input.voltage: 118.0
input.voltage.nominal: 120
output.voltage: 135.0
ups.beeper.status: enabled
ups.delay.shutdown: 20
ups.delay.start: 30
ups.load: 63
ups.mfr: CPS
ups.model: OR500LCDRM1Ua
ups.productid: 0601
ups.realpower.nominal: 300
ups.serial: GA4JW2000855
ups.status: OL
ups.test.result: No test initiated
ups.timer.shutdown: -60
ups.timer.start: -60
ups.vendorid: 0764
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1338 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMPTFBSXA5JCBI6TQPS5G3VE4YQTANCNFSM5RQM5VUA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi, battery.charge: 100 |
As a fellow owner of a CP1500PFCLCDa (US Model - ProductID: 0601), I believe this issue is related to issue #439 and fix #1245. This addresses an issue with CPS firmware returning and invalid LogMin/Max value but the fix is only applied for product ID 0x0501: Line 285 in 587af14
@flashydave posted in #439 2 days ago saying it should be an easy fix and would raise a PR, my guess just adding in the additional ProductID |
Exacrly right!
I am away from my PC so if you want to do the change then im happy for you to
proceed.
Dave
…On 12:07, Tue 12 Jul 22, Austin Sabel wrote:
As a fellow owner of a CP1500PFCLCDa (US Model - ProductID: 0601), I believe this issue is related to issue #439 and fix #1245. This addresses an issue with CPS firmware returning and invalid LogMin/Max value but the fix is only applied for product ID 0x0501: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/587af14347cb1a85a093eca603c2c3c29cab9c89/drivers/cps-hid.c#L285.
@flashydave posted in #439 2 days ago saying it should be an easy fix and would raise a PR, my guess just adding in the additional ProductID `0x0601` in the if statement so it runs `cps_fix_report_desc` and doesn't just return.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1338 (comment)
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Thanks! |
Issue is still there:
Values:
|
@icservis : Hello, can you please try an exploratory fix #1338 (comment) perhaps with the master-branch codebase (2.8.0 is almost 2 years ago now)? Note that per https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/wiki/Building-NUT-for-in%E2%80%90place-upgrades-or-non%E2%80%90disruptive-tests you don't necessarily have to install a custom build over the system-provided package just to test if it helps; you can later install over that if it actually helps :) |
PR #2718 is presumed to have fixed the broken CPS input/output voltage reports mentioned in this issue (although it did not focus on cases of "voltage too high" like here). PR #1245 is presumed to have fixed the broken CPS transfer voltage reports discussed in this issue, at least the high one. Both values were reported reasonable here and in #1512 and #2718 testing, though... |
I recently bought OR1500ERM1U and I"m very happy it's supported by Nut. Thanks a lot!
I see a minor issue in upsc:
input.voltage: 232.0
input.voltage.nominal: 230
output.voltage: 253.0
The value 253 in output.voltage is actually high transfer value. Probably easy to fix.
Version 2.7.4-5004-g1f143e5e (recemt/current git branch master)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: