My thoughts after the first month of use #645
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
I apologize for not reading all of it, I'm a fellow user of aerospace but I wanted to tell you a couple of things:
I'll probably make my own post with my thoughts about this, this was inspirational |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have used BetterTouchTool to switch between workspaces: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I wonder if aerospace list-* queries could be used to build 3rd party workspace visualizer. I understand, the aerospace author is not keen on GUI bells and whistles, which is fair. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey there!
I've switched to aerospace about a month ago and for my workflow, it's a big upgrade from the classic Sequoia experience or even Software like Rectangle.
Especially the straightforward config was very easy to get into.
There's two key faults i see in aerospace and want to spark a discussion about, especially 2. is very important to me.
1. Localized keyboard layouts
The default config is completely unusable with the german macOS keyboard layout.
This is because it binds to option + 56789 and L, which in the german macOS keyboard are already bound to [, ], |, {, } and @.
So for my config, i had to unbind the workspaces 56789, so i can use the brackets.
I also had to switch the navigation keys from HJKL to UIOP, so option + L is not blocked for the @ symbol.
Getting to this point as a beginner is not quite beginner friendly. It could be suggested to provide localized layouts or promote a place to show off own configs so beginners can more easily get started. Once i got the hang of it though, it wasn't a problem anymore.
2. Using aerospace alongside macOS spaces, not as a replacement
As Josean Martinez correctly mentions in his introduction, aerospace reimplements workspaces, because there are limitations with the built in Spaces, especially in terms of keyboard shortcuts and animation speed.
The problem is, that it misses some of Mission Control and macOS spaces's most important benifits.
So, what's the solution?
Now, can't we already just use macOS Spaces and just stay on aerospace workspace 1 all the time? That would be nice, but no, we cannot. Let me give you an example.
Let's say I'm on a macOS Space and I'm on aerospace workspace 3. Both are empty:
When i open a window, it tiles correctly as expected.
But if i now open a new macOS Space, that also belongs to workspace 3 and open another window, the newly opened window tiles WITH THE WINDOW ON ANOTHER macOS SPACE.
Going back to the first space, we see, that it tiles with the other space, making it completely impossible to use macOS spaces, while aerospace is installed.
Besides, we will never get rid of macOS spaces anyways. Things like full screen Browser videos will always create a macOS Space.
Users need a way to turn off aerospace workspaces, if they prefer to use aerospace only for window tiling, not for workspace management. Because macOS is already very good at virtual desktop management.
Thanks for reading through this. I'm eager to hear about your opinion.
Cheers!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions