What is the applicable license?

[Pign]

Hello and thanks for the work on this module.

Unless I am mistaken, the code repo mentions MIT as being the license for it while the page https://nodemailer.com/extras/mailparser/ mentions MIT and EUPL.

Is it possible to clarify what are applicable licenses? Those two seem to me (not a lawyer) to be very different since EUPL is, as far as I understand it, highly contaminating (although I like the idea of it being European and emanating from the Commission).

[oparisblue]

+1, this would be good to clarify, especially as a former issue (#188) seems to indicate a move away from the MIT license entirely, yet today the EUPL license is only referenced on the website, and not in the LICENSE file in the repo.

[tommoor]

The README states MIT at the end

[oparisblue]

The website now also states

Dual licensed under MIT or EUPLv1.1+

So it seems reasonable to conclude that it can be considered as MIT licensed now.