You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2024. It is now read-only.
It would be nice to have to have a separate social title for things like Facebook and Twitter. They allow for more text, but more importantly, they are two different intents.
Whereas I might create a keyword stuffed title with company name etc. separated by pipes, my social title should be something more familiar or colloquial. eg:
SEO title
Great Widgets | Shop for Widgets | The Widget Store
Social title
We've got great Widgets at the Widget Store, Check them Out!
Obviously this would fallback on the seotitle if I did not want to go the extra step in adding a social title. I would assume there are going to be SEO managers wanting something different for each social media service, but I think that just starts going down a rabbit hole. A simple socialtitle that falls back on the seotitle might satisfy 90% of the people who would want this sort of thing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to have to have a separate social title for things like Facebook and Twitter. They allow for more text, but more importantly, they are two different intents.
Whereas I might create a keyword stuffed title with company name etc. separated by pipes, my social title should be something more familiar or colloquial. eg:
SEO title
Great Widgets | Shop for Widgets | The Widget Store
Social title
We've got great Widgets at the Widget Store, Check them Out!
Obviously this would fallback on the seotitle if I did not want to go the extra step in adding a social title. I would assume there are going to be SEO managers wanting something different for each social media service, but I think that just starts going down a rabbit hole. A simple socialtitle that falls back on the seotitle might satisfy 90% of the people who would want this sort of thing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: