Should we continue to create multifont packages like Fontawesome 6

[johnf]

We have moved to a package per font approach, which raises an interesting question about "multi icon fonts" like Fontawesome 6 and Material Icons.

Should Fontawesome 6 be multiple packages?

The current Pro font has 17 fonts. These are comprised of 5 styles with 4 weights each (ignoring brands). The saving grace here is that, given that this is a paid font, it's up to the user to choose which fonts to include in their application.

Material Symbols would have a similar issue with three different font styles.

I lean towards separate packages for each style as this would remove a lot of complexity, especially around the typescript types.

@oblador, do you have a view of the best approach for existing and new fonts?

NOTE: I've created this discussion on the back of #1703