You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
TLDR: OpenCL adapter implementation of urEnqueueUSMFill calls clEnqueueMemFillINTEL for power-of-2 pattern size without checking destination memory alignment required by clEnqueueMemFillINTEL.
confirmed that it's the clEnqueueMemFillINTEL call which sometimes returns -30 (CL_INVALID_VALUE).
EnqueueMemFillINTEL(patternSize=32) return code -30
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'sycl::_V1::exception'
what(): Enqueue process failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
I noticed that in my build of UR / DPC++ this happens when the binary name is shorter than 24 characters, but stops happening when it is longer. Simply renaming the file changes the behaviour. In another build I got the opposite behaviour where short-named binary succeeds but long-named fails. I assume what happens is that long file name causes heap allocation for argv[0] and shifts the memory layout, and thus alignment of the device allocation.
$ # short name fails
$ ./miniEnqueueMemFillINTEL(patternSize=32) return code -30terminate called after throwing an instance of 'sycl::_V1::exception' what(): Enqueue process failed.Aborted (core dumped)
$ # rename the file
$ cp mini mini12341234123412341234
$ # long name succeeds
$ ./mini12341234123412341234EnqueueMemFillINTEL(patternSize=32) return code 0
CL_INVALID_VALUE if dst_ptr is NULL, or if dst_ptr is not aligned to pattern_size bytes
so I assume this is what happens as I checked the other conditions for returning CL_INVALID_VALUE are not met.
IIUC neither SYCL API nor UR API make any requirements about the destination memory alignment for their USM fill functions, therefore it is incorrect for the implementation to assume alignment. I think the solution here could be to check the alignment and take the other (slower) path which doesn't call clEnqueueMemFillINTEL when the alignment requirement is not met.
Side note: something seems to be lost in error handling here as the user is informed neither about the error code (INVALID_VALUE) nor its origin (USM fill). There is only a generic exception thrown by the SYCL runtime.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The test was added back with intel/llvm#16544 now properly marked as UNSUPPORTED: (opencl && cpu). The issue is still there and the test can be used to validate future fixes (in addition to the reproducer above).
TLDR: OpenCL adapter implementation of
urEnqueueUSMFill
callsclEnqueueMemFillINTEL
for power-of-2 pattern size without checking destination memory alignment required byclEnqueueMemFillINTEL
.Full Story:
I ran into this issue when trying to add
sycl::queue::fill
test in intel/llvm#15991 (specific CI run failure: https://github.com/intel/llvm/actions/runs/11971631535/job/33695502538?pr=15991)I will disable the OpenCL CPU backend in the e2e test, linking this issue in a comment, so it can be re-enabled when the problem is solved.
The minimal reproducer for the issue is:
compiled and ran with:
Debugging further with this UR change:
confirmed that it's the
clEnqueueMemFillINTEL
call which sometimes returns -30 (CL_INVALID_VALUE
).I noticed that in my build of UR / DPC++ this happens when the binary name is shorter than 24 characters, but stops happening when it is longer. Simply renaming the file changes the behaviour. In another build I got the opposite behaviour where short-named binary succeeds but long-named fails. I assume what happens is that long file name causes heap allocation for
argv[0]
and shifts the memory layout, and thus alignment of the device allocation.I note that
clEnqueueMemFillINTEL
as described here:https://registry.khronos.org/OpenCL/extensions/intel/cl_intel_unified_shared_memory.html
may return:
so I assume this is what happens as I checked the other conditions for returning
CL_INVALID_VALUE
are not met.IIUC neither SYCL API nor UR API make any requirements about the destination memory alignment for their USM fill functions, therefore it is incorrect for the implementation to assume alignment. I think the solution here could be to check the alignment and take the other (slower) path which doesn't call
clEnqueueMemFillINTEL
when the alignment requirement is not met.Side note: something seems to be lost in error handling here as the user is informed neither about the error code (INVALID_VALUE) nor its origin (USM fill). There is only a generic exception thrown by the SYCL runtime.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: