MANDATORY MATCH

[jacobfriedman]

Taking this from examples:

MANDATORY MATCH (u:User {id: $user})
MANDATORY MATCH (c:City {name: $city})
MANDATORY MATCH (old:Product {id: $product})<-[:BOUGHT]-(u)
MATCH (store)-[:IN]->(c),
   (store)-[:SELLS]->(new:Product),
   (new)-[:MADE_BY]->(brand)<-[:MADE_BY]-(old)
WHERE new.availability > 0 AND new.category = old.category
RETURN store, count(DISTINCT new) AS offers
ORDER BY offers

See here

I can't find any rules in the EBNF for MANDATORY MATCH, even though MANDATORY is a reserved word. Please advise...

[petraselmer]

Hi Jacob

Thank you for raising this issue.

Although MANDATORY MATCH was accepted into Cypher, it is not at this current time included in the TCK and grammar.

I have added a note to this effect at the top of the article -- apologies for the confusion.

[jacobfriedman]

Thanks Petra — On that note; is there anything else that could be missing?

…

On Tue., Aug. 2, 2022, 6:55 a.m. Petra Selmer, ***@***.***> wrote: Hi Jacob Thank you for raising this issue. Although MANDATORY MATCH was accepted into Cypher, it is not at this current time included in the TCK and grammar. I have added a note to this effect at the top of the article -- apologies for the confusion. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#538 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFKHXSDR2WDKVVGLFGDTQLVXD5BLANCNFSM54MIHAOQ> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[petraselmer]

Hi Jacob, not to our knowledge.