You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
When migrating the Exel to json each column was treated as one value. But when you want to filter the input, it get's tricky:
If you want to define the attribute "crypto agility", the answer could be true or false. In this case a filter is easy to implement and also the input validation.
But for some attributes you want to add some information to clarify the answer. Like: "it has crypto agility, but you can only use EC based curves". For such cases these attributes need a second field. We could implement it as a nested object or as Boolean. Json schema allows us to treat it as Boolean and a specific field and to validate it during the cicd pipeline.
Suggestions:
define a general object for filter based fields (e.g. { value: boolean, description: string }
challenge all existing data and update them
Another point is how to deal with resources. Right now we can insert links directly in the value and it will get rendered as a html link. But could it be better to add links in a separate field for more use cases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When migrating the Exel to json each column was treated as one value. But when you want to filter the input, it get's tricky:
If you want to define the attribute "crypto agility", the answer could be true or false. In this case a filter is easy to implement and also the input validation.
But for some attributes you want to add some information to clarify the answer. Like: "it has crypto agility, but you can only use EC based curves". For such cases these attributes need a second field. We could implement it as a nested object or as Boolean. Json schema allows us to treat it as Boolean and a specific field and to validate it during the cicd pipeline.
Suggestions:
{ value: boolean, description: string }
Another point is how to deal with resources. Right now we can insert links directly in the value and it will get rendered as a html link. But could it be better to add links in a separate field for more use cases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: