Tasks hanging on 6.12.0-4.el9ueknext.x86_64 #32
Comments
|
@danielnorberg no we have not seen this before, can you provide more information about the system that you're testing this on? |
|
@darrenkenny Sure. The messages above are from Oracle Cloud bare metal instances, mostly The hosts run gVisor containers with different GPU workloads, often ML inference jobs. To fully utilize the hosts we typically schedule multiple containers for separate workloads per host. The workloads are often bursty, at times saturating network/disk I/O or CPU/mem, depending on the workload and phase of execution. Happy to provide more specific details if that would be useful. |
oraclelinuxkernel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 28, 2025
Add a check to mlx5e_xmit() for shorter frames. A corrupted/malformed packet, with shorter length can eventually cause system panic further down in the code path. Avoid it by validating the length and dropping it at the earliest. Following is seen in our env with shorter skb->len crash> bt PID: 76981 TASK: ff19828cfe508000 CPU: 106 COMMAND: "vhost-76942" #0 [ff2d20159b39f2c8] machine_kexec at ffffffffad884801 #1 [ff2d20159b39f328] __crash_kexec at ffffffffad976142 #2 [ff2d20159b39f3f8] panic at ffffffffad8b3640 #3 [ff2d20159b39f4a0] no_context at ffffffffad8954e1 #4 [ff2d20159b39f518] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffffad8958de #5 [ff2d20159b39f578] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffffad895a96 #6 [ff2d20159b39f588] do_kern_addr_fault at ffffffffad89688e #7 [ff2d20159b39f5b0] __do_page_fault at ffffffffad896b30 #8 [ff2d20159b39f618] do_page_fault at ffffffffad896db6 #9 [ff2d20159b39f650] page_fault at ffffffffae402acd [exception RIP: memcpy_erms+6] RIP: ffffffffae261ab6 RSP: ff2d20159b39f700 RFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ff198291741ecf2e RBX: ff19828e70d6a100 RCX: fffffffffea1af2b RDX: fffffffffffffffd RSI: ff19828eba6d7e5e RDI: ff198291757d2000 RBP: ff2d20159b39f760 R8: ff198291741ecf00 R9: 000000000000037c R10: 000000000000003c R11: ff19828ffe953940 R12: ff198291741ecf20 R13: ff198267dcb1b600 R14: ff19828eeebb09c0 R15: ff198291741ecf00 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #10 [ff2d20159b39f700] mlx5e_sq_xmit_wqe at ffffffffc05c162e [mlx5_core] #11 [ff2d20159b39f768] mlx5e_xmit at ffffffffc05c1ca3 [mlx5_core] #12 [ff2d20159b39f800] dev_hard_start_xmit at ffffffffae083766 #13 [ff2d20159b39f860] sch_direct_xmit at ffffffffae0e2564 #14 [ff2d20159b39f8b0] __qdisc_run at ffffffffae0e294e #15 [ff2d20159b39f928] __dev_queue_xmit at ffffffffae083eee #16 [ff2d20159b39f9a8] dev_queue_xmit at ffffffffae084370 #17 [ff2d20159b39f9b8] vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit at ffffffffc2fb6fec [8021q] #18 [ff2d20159b39f9d8] dev_hard_start_xmit at ffffffffae083766 #19 [ff2d20159b39fa38] __dev_queue_xmit at ffffffffae08416a #20 [ff2d20159b39fab8] dev_queue_xmit_accel at ffffffffae08438e #21 [ff2d20159b39fac8] macvlan_start_xmit at ffffffffc2fc18d9 [macvlan] #22 [ff2d20159b39faf0] dev_hard_start_xmit at ffffffffae083766 #23 [ff2d20159b39fb50] sch_direct_xmit at ffffffffae0e2564 #24 [ff2d20159b39fba0] __qdisc_run at ffffffffae0e294e #25 [ff2d20159b39fc18] __dev_queue_xmit at ffffffffae083c81 #26 [ff2d20159b39fc90] dev_queue_xmit at ffffffffae084370 #27 [ff2d20159b39fca0] tap_sendmsg at ffffffffc07206ed [tap] #28 [ff2d20159b39fd20] vhost_tx_batch at ffffffffc2fd6590 [vhost_net] #29 [ff2d20159b39fd68] handle_tx_copy at ffffffffc2fd70f3 [vhost_net] #30 [ff2d20159b39fe80] handle_tx at ffffffffc2fd7651 [vhost_net] #31 [ff2d20159b39feb0] handle_tx_kick at ffffffffc2fd76b5 [vhost_net] #32 [ff2d20159b39fec0] vhost_worker at ffffffffc12a5be8 [vhost] #33 [ff2d20159b39ff08] kthread at ffffffffad8dbfe5 #34 [ff2d20159b39ff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffae400364 This change was discussed with Nvidia and they are in agreement. Orabug: 36660755 Fixes: e4cf27b ("net/mlx5e: Re-eanble client vlan TX acceleration") Reported-and-tested-by: Dongli Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Patil <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Si-Wei Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jack Vogel <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thank you for UEK-next, it is very useful.
We recently tried
6.12.0-4.el9ueknext.x86_64and had issues with processes hanging. Some example kernel logs:We could also see
psandtopetc hanging on these hosts.We have not seen similar issues with
6.10.0-2.el9ueknext.x86_64.Is this a known issue with
6.12.0-4.el9ueknext.x86_64?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: