Problem with the energy of the directed P-wave vs S-wave using SPECFEM2D #1626
qnstar
started this conversation in
SPECFEM2D [General]
Replies: 1 comment
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all,
I am new to SPECFEM2D. I have a problem with the energy of the directed S-wave and your help is appreciated. I am running specfem2D to calculate the wave field under the assumption of a simple two-layer layered geological model using an elastic wave source (see attached parameters). I hope to obtain the stratigraphic structure by picking up multiple seismic reflection data. However, I found that the energy of S-waves has always been higher than that of P-waves in both horizontal and vertical components of seismic wave records.
Table 1. model parameters
According to the Seismic wave propagation theory and observation system settings, the energy of the directed P-wave in the horizontal component is strong, while the energy of the directed S-wave is weak. In the vertical component, both the direct S-wave and the reflected P-wave have strong energy.
The simulation results show that the energy of S-waves in the horizontal component is strong, and the energy of reflected P-waves in the vertical component is weak. The energy of reflected S-waves has always been strong compared to P-waves, which seems to be inconsistent with conventional seismic exploration simulations.
I hope to use a vertical force source to simulate better reflected P-wave responses. I don't know if this is a problem with setting the source parameters? This force source seems to be a horizontally applied force in the wave field, which does not seem to be the desired result for our model.
I would like to know how the force of the elastic force source using specfem2D works? Is it the problem with the source or the parameter settings? I look forward to your help. Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions