You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @VMarfima,
Sorry for very late reply on this. Yes I think docs/summaries/fire/jupiter/fire_probability.md is redundant; I will remove docs/summaries entirely. As you say, the onboarding classes docstrings should be (and mostly are) used to document the indicator onboarding/model. Also we have the description field in the HazardResource which flows into the inventory or STAC. I think it is good that these are treated as separate things but docs/summaries is unnecessary.
It seems that the documentation in docs/summaries/fire/jupiter/fire_probability.md is incomplete.
The broader question is whether it is needed at all.
Should the onboarding classes give the description (in docstrings) and the documentation compile that (pure sphinx)?
Also, in the case of jupiter it is not clear where the csv is obtained from (so the onboarding cannot be replicated).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: